Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26080831›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology practice2015

Predictors of Long-Term Quality of Life for Survivors of Stage II/III Rectal Cancer in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium.

Mary E Charlton, Karyn B Stitzenberg, Chi Lin, Jennifer A Schlichting, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson, Grelda Yazmin Juarez, Jane F Pendergast, Elizabeth A Chrischilles, Robert B Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mary E CharltonUniversity of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ mary-charlton@uiowa.edu.
Karyn B StitzenbergUniversity of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ.
Chi LinUniversity of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ.
Jennifer A SchlichtingUniversity of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ.
Thorvardur R HalfdanarsonUniversity of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ.
Grelda Yazmin JuarezUniversity of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ.
Jane F PendergastUniversity of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ.
Elizabeth A ChrischillesUniversity of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ.
Robert B WallaceUniversity of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Mark E Burkard · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Pulmonary Toxicology Facility CoreP30ES005605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANS-JOACHIM LEHMLER · 1990 to 2026
$40.5M
PROPENSITY SCORES IN HIERARCHICAL MODELSU01CA093344 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI AYANIAN, JOHN Z., FOUAD, MONA N. · 2001 to 2011
$19.5M
Lung/Colon Cancer Outcomes--Cancer Research NetworkU01CA093332 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI WEEKS, JANE C. · 2001 to 2008
$7.4M
RAND-UCLA CanCORS PDCR ApplicationU01CA093348 · NCI · RAND CORPORATION · PI KAHN, KATHERINE LESLIE · 2001 to 2008
$7.3M
Cancer Care Outcomes Research &Surveillance ConsortiumU01CA093324 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI AYANIAN, JOHN Z. · 2001 to 2008
$7.1M
RACIAL DISPARITIES IN END OF LIFE CARE--ACCESSU01CA093329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FOUAD, MONA N. · 2001 to 2008
$6.6M
NC Colorectal Cancer Care Outcomes Research StudyU01CA093326 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SANDLER, ROBERT S. · 2001 to 2008
$4.3M
Lung Cancer Care Outcomes/Surveillance Consortium-IowaU01CA093339 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WALLACE, ROBERT BRUCE · 2001 to 2008
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093324NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093326NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093329NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093332NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093339NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093344NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093348NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany patients do not receive guideline-recommended neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer. Little is known regarding long-term quality of life (QOL) associated with various treatment approaches. Our objective was to determine patient characteristics and subsequent QOL associated with treatment approach.

methodsOur study was a geographically diverse population- and health system-based cohort study that included adults age 21 years or older with newly diagnosed stage II/III rectal cancer who were recruited from 2003 to 2005. Eligible patients were contacted 1 to 4 months after diagnosis and asked to participate in a telephone survey and to consent to medical record review, with separate follow-up QOL surveys conducted 1 and 7 years after diagnosis.

resultsTwo hundred thirty-nine patients with stage II/III rectal cancer were included in this analysis. Younger age (< 65 v ≥ 65 years: odds ratio, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.33 to 4.65) was significantly associated with increased odds of receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The adjuvant chemoradiotherapy group had significantly worse mean EuroQol-5D (range, 0 to 1) and Short Form-12 physical health component scores (standardized mean, 50) at 1-year follow-up than the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (0.75 v 0.85; P = .002; 37.2 v 43.3; P = .01, respectively) and the group that received only one or neither form of treatment (0.75 v 0.85; P = .02; 37.2 v 45.1; P = .008, respectively).

conclusionNeoadjuvant treatment may result in better QOL and functional status 1 year after diagnosis. Further evaluation of patient and provider reasons for not pursuing neoadjuvant therapy is necessary to determine how and where to target process improvement and/or education efforts to ensure that patients have access to recommended treatment options.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedAge FactorsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPatient Education as TopicRadiotherapy, Adjuvant

Identifiers

PMID26080831
PMCPMC4507395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.