Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26080794›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2015

Grading of Crohn's disease activity using CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy: a meta-analysis.

C A J Puylaert, J A W Tielbeek, S Bipat, J Stoker

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Structured Versus Non-Structured Reporting of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Imaging: A Systematic Review.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Monitoring of patients with active inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Inflammatory bowel disease cross-sectional imaging: What's new?United European gastroenterology journal · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C A J PuylaertAcademic Medical Center, Department of Radiology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105AZ, The Netherlands. c.a.puylaert@amc.uva.nl.
J A W TielbeekAcademic Medical Center, Department of Radiology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105AZ, The Netherlands.
S BipatAcademic Medical Center, Department of Radiology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105AZ, The Netherlands.
J StokerAcademic Medical Center, Department of Radiology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105AZ, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the grading of Crohn's disease activity using CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy. MATERIALS AND

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched (January 1983-March 2014) for studies evaluating CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy in grading Crohn's disease activity compared to endoscopy, biopsies or intraoperative findings. Two independent reviewers assessed the data. Three-by-three tables (none, mild, frank disease) were constructed for all studies, and estimates of accurate, over- and under-grading were calculated/summarized by fixed or random effects models.

resultsOur search yielded 9356 articles, 19 of which were included. Per-patient data showed accurate grading values for CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy of 86% (95% CI: 75-93%), 84% (95% CI: 67-93%), 44% (95% CI: 28-61%) and 40% (95% CI: 16-70%), respectively. In the per-patient analysis, CT and MRI showed similar accurate grading estimates (P = 0.8). Per-segment data showed accurate grading values for CT and scintigraphy of 87% (95% CI: 77-93%) and 86% (95% CI: 80-91%), respectively. MRI and US showed grading accuracies of 67-82% and 56-75%, respectively.

conclusionsCT and MRI showed comparable high accurate grading estimates in the per-patient analysis. Results for US and scintigraphy were inconsistent, and limited data were available. KEY POINTS: • CT and MRI have comparable high accuracy in grading Crohn's disease. • Data on US and scintigraphy is inconsistent and limited. • MRI is preferable over CT as it lacks ionizing radiation exposure.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCrohn DiseaseFemaleHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyReference StandardsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyYoung AdultCrohn’s diseaseMagnetic resonance imagingRadionuclide imagingUltrasoundX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID26080794
PMCPMC4595539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.