Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26080310›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2015

Friends, not foes: Magnetoencephalography as a tool to uncover brain dynamics during transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Toralf Neuling, Philipp Ruhnau, Marco Fuscà, Gianpaolo Demarchi, Christoph S Herrmann, Nathan Weisz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Addiction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Synchronizing Brain Rhythms to Improve Cognition.Annual review of medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Probing the Link Between Perception and Oscillations: Lessons from Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Toralf NeulingCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Via Delle Regole 101, 38123 Mattarello (Trento), Italy. Electronic address: toralf.neuling@unitn.it.
Philipp RuhnauCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Via Delle Regole 101, 38123 Mattarello (Trento), Italy.
Marco FuscàCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Via Delle Regole 101, 38123 Mattarello (Trento), Italy.
Gianpaolo DemarchiCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Via Delle Regole 101, 38123 Mattarello (Trento), Italy.
Christoph S HerrmannExperimental Psychology Lab, Center for Excellence "Hearing4all," European Medical School, University of Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany; Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Strasse 9-11, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
Nathan WeiszCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Via Delle Regole 101, 38123 Mattarello (Trento), Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain oscillations are supposedly crucial for normal cognitive functioning and alterations are associated with cognitive dysfunctions. To demonstrate their causal role on behavior, entrainment approaches in particular aim at driving endogenous oscillations via rhythmic stimulation. Within this context, transcranial electrical stimulation, especially transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), has received renewed attention. This is likely due to the possibility of defining oscillatory stimulation properties precisely. Also, measurements comparing pre-tACS with post-tACS electroencephalography (EEG) have shown impressive modulations. However, the period during tACS has remained a blackbox until now, due to the enormous stimulation artifact. By means of application of beamforming to magnetoencephalography (MEG) data, we successfully recovered modulations of the amplitude of brain oscillations during weak and strong tACS. Additionally, we demonstrate that also evoked responses to visual and auditory stimuli can be recovered during tACS. The main contribution of the present study is to provide critical evidence that during ongoing tACS, subtle modulations of oscillatory brain activity can be reconstructed even at the stimulation frequency. Future tACS experiments will be able to deliver direct physiological insights in order to further the understanding of the contribution of brain oscillations to cognition and behavior.

Indexed as

Alpha RhythmSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultAuditory PerceptionCerebral CortexEvoked Potentials, AuditoryEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleTranscranial Direct Current StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung AdultArtifact rejectionEntrainmentMagnetoencephalographyMEGtACSTranscranial alternating current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID26080310
PMCPMC4686537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.