Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26079805›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Nicotinergic Modulation of Attention-Related Neural Activity Differentiates Polymorphisms of DRD2 and CHRNA4 Receptor Genes.

Thomas P K Breckel, Carsten Giessing, Anja Gieseler, Sarah Querbach, Martin Reuter, Christiane M Thiel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetics of OCD and Related Disorders; Searching for Shared Factors.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Application of a machine learning method to whole brain white matter injury after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas P K BreckelBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Carsten GiessingBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; Research Center Neurosensory Science, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Anja GieselerBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Sarah QuerbachBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Martin ReuterPersonality & Biological Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Center for Economics & Neuroscience (CENs), Laboratory of Neurogenetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christiane M ThielBiological Psychology, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; Research Center Neurosensory Science, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEHearing4all · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive and neuronal effects of nicotine show high interindividual variability. Recent findings indicate that genetic variations that affect the cholinergic and dopaminergic neurotransmitter system impact performance in cognitive tasks and effects of nicotine. The current pharmacogenetic functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study aimed to investigate epistasis effects of CHRNA4/DRD2 variations on behavioural and neural correlates of visuospatial attention after nicotine challenge using a data driven partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) approach. Fifty young healthy non-smokers were genotyped for CHRNA4 (rs1044396) and DRD2 (rs6277). They received either 7 mg transdermal nicotine or a matched placebo in a double blind within subject design prior to performing a cued target detection task with valid and invalid trials. On behavioural level, the strongest benefits of nicotine in invalid trials were observed in participants carrying both, the DRD2 T- and CHRNA4 C+ variant. Neurally, we were able to demonstrate that different DRD2/CHRNA4 groups can be decoded from the pattern of brain activity in invalid trials under nicotine. Neural substrates of interindividual variability were found in a network of attention-related brain regions comprising the pulvinar, the striatum, the middle and superior frontal gyri, the insula, the left precuneus, and the right middle temporal gyrus. Our findings suggest that polymorphisms in the CHRNA4 and DRD2 genes are a relevant source of individual variability in pharmacological studies with nicotine.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticAdultAttentionBrain MappingDouble-Blind MethodEpistasis, GeneticFemaleGenotypeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMultivariate AnalysisNicotinePhotic StimulationReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, NicotinicDRD2 protein, humanNicotineReceptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID26079805
PMCPMC4469651
OpenAlexW1559392677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.