Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26079640›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2015

Crew Resource Management in the Intensive Care Unit: a prospective 3-year cohort study.

M H T M Haerkens, M Kox, J Lemson, S Houterman, J G van der Hoeven, P Pickkers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Crisis Resource Management and Non-Technical Skills Training in Anesthesia: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Medical dispatchers' perception of the interaction with the caller during emergency calls - a qualitative study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Applying a Model of Teamwork Processes to Emergency Medical Services.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M H T M HaerkensDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
M KoxDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J LemsonDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
S HoutermanDepartment of Education and Research, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
J G van der HoevenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
P PickkersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman factors account for the majority of adverse events in both aviation and medicine. Human factors awareness training entitled "Crew Resource Management (CRM)" is associated with improved aviation safety. We determined whether implementation of CRM impacts outcome in critically ill patients.

methodsWe performed a prospective 3-year cohort study in a 32-bed ICU, admitting 2500-3000 patients yearly. At the end of the baseline year, all personnel received CRM training, followed by 1 year of implementation. The third year was defined as the clinical effect year. All 7271 patients admitted to the ICU in the study period were included. The primary outcome measure was ICU complication rate. Secondary outcome measures were ICU and hospital length of stay, and standardized mortality ratio.

resultsOccurrence of serious complications was 67.1/1000 patients and 66.4/1000 patients during the baseline and implementation year respectively, decreasing to 50.9/1000 patients in the post-implementation year (P = 0.03). Adjusted odds ratios for occurrence of complications were 0.92 (95% CI 0.71-1.19, P = 0.52) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.51-0.87, P = 0.003) in the implementation and post-implementation year. The incidence of cardiac arrests was 9.2/1000 patients and 8.3/1000 patients during the baseline and implementation year, decreasing to 3.5/1000 patients (P = 0.04) in the post-implementation year, while cardiopulmonary resuscitation success rate increased from 19% to 55% and 67% (P = 0.02). Standardized mortality ratio decreased from 0.72 (95% CI 0.63-0.81) in the baseline year to 0.60 (95% CI 0.53-0.67) in the post-implementation year (P = 0.04).

conclusionOur data indicate an association between CRM implementation and reduction in serious complications and lower mortality in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHeart ArrestHospital MortalityHumansInservice TrainingMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Care TeamProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26079640
PMCPMC5033035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.