Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26079299›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2015

Cancer survival differences between South Asians and non-South Asians of England in 1986-2004, accounting for age at diagnosis and deprivation.

C Maringe, R Li, P Mangtani, M P Coleman, B Rachet

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cancer research funding in South Asia.Journal of cancer policy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C MaringeFaculty of Epidemiology and population Health, London school of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
R LiFaculty of Epidemiology and population Health, London school of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
P MangtaniFaculty of Epidemiology and population Health, London school of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
M P ColemanFaculty of Epidemiology and population Health, London school of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
B RachetFaculty of Epidemiology and population Health, London school of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11700Cancer Research UK 16148Cancer Research UK 18348Cancer Research UK 18525Cancer Research UK C1336/A11700Cancer Research UK C23112/A2810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSouth Asian migrants show lower cancer incidence than their host population in England for most major cancers. We seek to study the ethnic differences in survival from cancer.

methodsWe described and modelled the effect of ethnicity, time, age and deprivation on survival for the five most incident cancers in each sex in South Asians in England between 1986 and 2004 using national cancer registry data. South Asian ethnicity was flagged using the validated name-recognition algorithm SANGRA (South Asian Names and Group Recognition Algorithm).

resultsWe observed survival advantage in South Asians in earlier periods. This ethnic gap either remained constant or narrowed over time. By 2004, age-standardised net survival was comparable for all cancers except three in men, where South Asians had higher survival 5 years after diagnosis: colorectal (58.9% vs 53.6%), liver (15.0% vs 9.4%) and lung (15.9% vs 9.3%). Compared with non-South Asians, South Asians experienced a slower increase in breast and prostate cancer survival, both cancers associated with either a screening programme or an early diagnosis test. We did not find differential patterns in survival by deprivation between both ethnicities.

conclusionsConsidering recent survival trends, appropriate action is required to avoid deficits in cancer survival among South Asians in the near future.

Indexed as

Age FactorsSurvival AnalysisAlgorithmsBangladeshEnglandHumansIndiaNeoplasmsPakistanRegistries

Identifiers

PMID26079299
PMCPMC4647525
OpenAlexW1835576021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.