Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26078975›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Intestinal Parasites in Cats from China.

Yurong Yang, Hongde Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  7. A coprological survey on helminths of JackalJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2023
    Article
  8. Metastrongyloid Infection withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prevalence ofBioMed research international · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yurong YangLaboratory of Veterinary Pathology, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agriculture University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8971-4648
Hongde LiangLaboratory of Veterinary Pathology, College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agriculture University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5705-8501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of intestinal parasites in cats from China was largely unknown prior to this study. The aim of the present study was to investigate the presence of intestinal parasites in cats from central China and also identify risk factors for parasitism. Fecal samples from 360 cats were examined using sugar flotation procedure and fecal smear test by microscope. Cats had mixed two or three kinds of parasites infections. Of the 360 cats feces, intestinal parasites positive feces were 149 (41.39%). 64 (17.78%) were infected with Toxocara cati, 61 (16.94%) with Isospora felis, 41 (11.39%) with Isospora rivolta, 33 (9.17%) with Paragonimus, 23 (6.39%) with hookworms, 11 (3.06%) with Toxoplasma-like oocysts, 10 (2.78%) with Trichuris, 4 (1.11%) with lungworm, 2 (0.56%) with Sarcocystis, and 1 (0.28%) with Trematode. The cats' living outdoor was identified as risk factor by statistical analysis. These results provide relevant basic data for assessing the infection of intestinal parasites in cats from central region of China. In conclusion, there was high prevalence of intestinal parasites in cats from China.

Indexed as

AncylostomatoideaAnimalsCat DiseasesCatsChinaFecesIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticIsosporaParagonimusParasitesRisk FactorsSarcocystisToxocaraToxoplasmaTrichuris

Identifiers

PMID26078975
PMCPMC4442275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.