Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26078959›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

Sensitive Detection of Thirteen Bacterial Vaginosis-Associated Agents Using Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Natália Malaguti, Larissa Danielle Bahls, Nelson Shozo Uchimura, Fabrícia Gimenes, Marcia Edilaine Lopes Consolaro

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Strong correlation between urine and vaginal swab samples for bacterial vaginosis.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natália MalagutiClinical Cytology and STD Laboratory, Department of Clinical Analysis and Biomedicine, State University of Maringá, 87020900 Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Larissa Danielle BahlsClinical Cytology and STD Laboratory, Department of Clinical Analysis and Biomedicine, State University of Maringá, 87020900 Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Nelson Shozo UchimuraDepartment of Medicine, State University of Maringá, 87020900 Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Fabrícia GimenesClinical Cytology and STD Laboratory, Department of Clinical Analysis and Biomedicine, State University of Maringá, 87020900 Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Marcia Edilaine Lopes ConsolaroClinical Cytology and STD Laboratory, Department of Clinical Analysis and Biomedicine, State University of Maringá, 87020900 Maringá, PR, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Maringá · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is characterized by a polymicrobial proliferation of anaerobic bacteria and depletion of lactobacilli, which are components of natural vaginal microbiota. Currently, there are limited conventional methods for BV diagnosis, and these methods are time-consuming, expensive, and rarely allow for the detection of more than one agent simultaneously. Therefore, we conceived and validated a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) assay for the simultaneous screening of thirteen bacterial vaginosis-associated agents (BV-AAs) related to symptomatic BV: Gardnerella vaginalis, Mobiluncus curtisii, Mobiluncus mulieris, Bacteroides fragilis, Mycoplasma hominis, Atopobium vaginae, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Megasphaera type I, Clostridia-like bacteria vaginosis-associated bacteria (BVABs) 1, 2, and 3, Sneathia sanguinegens, and Mycoplasma genitalium. The overall validation parameters of M-PCR compared to single PCR (sPCR) were extremely high, including agreement of 99.1% and sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values of 100.0%, negative predictive value of 97.0%, accuracy of 99.3%, and agreement with Nugent results of 100.0%. The prevalence of BV-AAs was very high (72.6%), and simultaneous agents were detected in 53.0%, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the M-PCR assay. Therefore, the M-PCR assay has great potential to impact BV diagnostic methods in vaginal samples and diminish associated complications in the near future.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaBacteria, AnaerobicDNA, BacterialFemaleHumansLactobacillusMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionSpecies SpecificityVaginaVaginosis, BacterialDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID26078959
PMCPMC4452834
OpenAlexW1482846003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.