Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26078831›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2015

Endoscopic ultrasound guided interventional procedures.

Vishal Sharma, Surinder S Rana, Deepak K Bhasin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Endoscopic step up: When and how.Surgery open science · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Advances in gastrointestinal surgical endoscopy.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021
    Review
  7. Safety and Efficacy of Early (<4 Weeks of Illness) Endoscopic Transmural Drainage of Post-acute Pancreatic Necrosis Predominantly Located in the Body of the Pancreas.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Endoscopic ultrasound: Current roles and future directions.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2017
    Review
  16. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Pancreas Cancer in 2016: A Review.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vishal SharmaVishal Sharma, Surinder S Rana, Deepak K Bhasin, Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160 012, India.
Surinder S RanaVishal Sharma, Surinder S Rana, Deepak K Bhasin, Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160 012, India.
Deepak K BhasinVishal Sharma, Surinder S Rana, Deepak K Bhasin, Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160 012, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as an important diagnostic and therapeutic modality in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy. EUS provides access to many organs and lesions which are in proximity to the gastrointestinal tract and thus giving an opportunity to target them for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. This modality also provides a real time opportunity to target the required area while avoiding adjacent vascular and other structures. Therapeutic EUS has found role in management of pancreatic fluid collections, biliary and pancreatic duct drainage in cases of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, drainage of gallbladder, celiac plexus neurolysis/blockage, drainage of mediastinal and intra-abdominal abscesses and collections and in targeted cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Infact, therapeutic EUS has emerged as the therapy of choice for management of pancreatic pseudocysts and recent innovations like fully covered removable metallic stents have improved results in patients with organised necrosis. Similarly, EUS guided drainage of biliary tract and pancreatic duct helps drainage of these systems in patients with failed cannulation, inaccessible papilla as with duodenal/gastric obstruction or surgically altered anatomy. EUS guided gall bladder drainage is a useful emergent procedure in patients with acute cholecystitis who are not fit for surgery. EUS guided celiac plexus neurolysis and blockage is more effective and less morbid vis-à-vis the percutaneous technique. The field of interventional EUS is rapidly advancing and many more interventions are being continuously added. This review focuses on the current status of evidence vis-à-vis the established indications of therapeutic EUS.

Indexed as

Abdominal abscessCeliac plexusCholecystostomyCholedochostomyCommon bile ductEndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirationEndosonographyPancreatic ductPancreatic pseudocystPhotochemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID26078831
PMCPMC4461937
OpenAlexW2402597272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.