Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26078828›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2015

Management of primary achalasia: The role of endoscopy.

Marisol Luján-Sanchis, Patricia Suárez-Callol, Ana Monzó-Gallego, Inmaculada Bort-Pérez, Lydia Plana-Campos, Luis Ferrer-Barceló, Laura Sanchis-Artero, María Llinares-Lloret, Juan Antonio Tuset-Ruiz, Javier Sempere-Garcia-Argüelles and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical management of achalasia: current state of the art.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marisol Luján-Sanchis
Patricia Suárez-Callol
Ana Monzó-Gallego
Inmaculada Bort-Pérez
Lydia Plana-Campos
Luis Ferrer-Barceló
Laura Sanchis-Artero
María Llinares-Lloret
Juan Antonio Tuset-Ruiz
Javier Sempere-Garcia-Argüelles
Pilar Canelles-Gamir
Enrique Medina-Chuliá

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achalasia is an oesophageal motor disorder which leads to the functional obstruction of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) and is currently incurable. The main objective of all existing therapies is to achieve a reduction in the obstruction of the distal oesophagus in order to improve oesophageal transit, relieve the symptomatology, and prevent long-term complications. The most common treatments used are pneumatic dilation (PD) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy, which involves partial fundoplication with comparable short-term success rates. The most economic non-surgical therapy is PD, with botulinum toxin injections reserved for patients with a higher surgical risk for whom the former treatment option is unsuitable. A new technology is peroral endoscopic myotomy, postulated as a possible non-invasive alternative to surgical myotomy. Other endoluminal treatments subject to research more recently include injecting ethanolamine into the LES and using a temporary self-expanding metallic stent. At present, there is not enough evidence permitting a routine recommendation of any of these three novel methods. Patients must undergo follow-up after treatment to guarantee that their symptoms are under control and to prevent complications. Most experts are in favour of some form of endoscopic follow-up, however no established guidelines exist in this respect. The prognosis for patients with achalasia is good, although a recurrence after treatment using any method requires new treatment.

Indexed as

AchalasiaBotulinum toxinDilationEndoscopic treatmentMyotomy

Identifiers

PMID26078828
PMCPMC4461934
OpenAlexW2344979821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.