ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2015
Clinicopathologic and molecular features associated with patient age in gastric cancer.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of human epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with gastric cancer: An updated meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- Clinical importance of E-cadherin deficiency in resectable gastric cancer: A nested case-control study.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Article
- Prognostic value of LODDS in late-onset gastric adenocarcinoma: analysis of SEER, TCGA, and external multicenter cohorts.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Construction of a modified TNM staging system and prediction model based on examined lymph node counts for gastric cancer patients at pathological stage N3.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Virtual biopsy using CT radiomics for evaluation of disagreement in pathology between endoscopic biopsy and postoperative specimens in patients with gastric cancer: a dual-energy CT generalizability study.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Gastric adenocarcinoma with high‑level microsatellite instability: A case report.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Survival benefits of palliative gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients with liver metastasis: a population-based propensity score-matched cohort analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes, and genetic alterations of younger patients with gastric cancer: Results from the China National Cancer Center and cBioPortal datasets.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- Gastric Cancer in Older Patients: A Retrospective Study and Literature Review.Annals of geriatric medicine and research · 2022Article
- ARE THERE DIFFERENCES IN LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRECTOMY MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY BETWEEN YOUNG AND OLDER?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022Observational
- Survival benefit of surgical resection for stage IV gastric cancer: A SEER-based propensity score-matched analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- The outcome of young vs. old gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- Associations of BNIP3 and DAPK1 gene polymorphisms with disease susceptibility, clinicopathologic features, anxiety, and depression in gastric cancer patients.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2021Article
- Gastric cancer in young patients: a separate entity with aggressive features and poor prognosis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020Article
- A nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in different age groups for operable gastric cancer: a population-based study.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Assessment of body composition and impact of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in patients with gastric cancer.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020Review
- Optimal cutoff age for predicting prognosis associated with serous epithelial ovarian cancer: what is the best age cutoff?Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2019Article
- Optimal management of resected gastric cancer.Cancer management and research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare characteristics and prognosis of gastric cancer based on age.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on clinical and molecular data from patients (n = 1658) with confirmed cases of gastric cancer in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (Seoul, South Korea) from 2003 to 2010 after exclusion of patients diagnosed with lymphoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and metastatic cancer in the stomach. DNA was isolated from tumor and adjacent normal tissue, and a set of five markers was amplified by polymerase chain reaction to assess microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI was categorized as high, low, or stable if ≥ 2, 1, or 0 markers, respectively, had changed. Immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue sections to detect levels of expression of p53, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2, and epidermal growth factor receptor. Statistical analysis of clinical and molecular data was performed to assess prognosis based on the stratification of patients by age (≤ 45 and > 45 years).
resultsAmong the 1658 gastric cancer patients, the number of patients with an age ≤ 45 years was 202 (12.2%; 38.9 ± 0.4 years) and the number of patients > 45 years was 1456 (87.8%; 64.1 ± 0.3 years). Analyses revealed that females were predominant in the younger group (P < 0.001). Gastric cancers in the younger patients exhibited more aggressive features and were at a more advanced stage than those in older patients. Precancerous lesions, such as atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia, were observed less frequently in the older than in the younger group (P < 0.001). Molecular characteristics, including overexpression of p53 (P < 0.001), overexpression of HER-2 (P = 0.006), and MSI (P = 0.006), were less frequent in gastric cancer of younger patients. Cancer related mortality was higher in younger patients (P = 0.048), but this difference was not significant after adjusting for the stage of cancer.
conclusionGastric cancer is distinguishable between younger and older patients based on both clinicopathologic and molecular features, but stage is the most important predictor of prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.