Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26078046›Full record

ArticleDer Internist2015

[Dyspnea. From the concept up to diagnostics].

R Ewert, S Gläser

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Internist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Dyspnea].Der Internist · 2017
    Review
  3. The Differential Diagnosis of Dyspnea.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R EwertKlinik für Innere Medizin B, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, F.-Sauerbruch-Str., 17475, Greifswald, Deutschland, ewert@uni-greifswald.de.
S Gläser
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dyspnea represents one of the most frequent and heterogeneous symptoms. The term dyspnea describes the subjective perception of an inadequate effort to breathe. In general, acute and chronic forms have to be differentiated. Due to its prognostic implications a structured work-up to find the correct diagnosis is of great importance. Depending on the condition of the patient, simple algorithms including biomarkers, an electrocardiogram, echocardiography and other imaging procedures are used when needed. Especially in its acute appearance life-threatening situations, such as myocardial ischemia, heart failure, pulmonary embolism and pneumothorax have to be rapidly and effectively excluded in the differential diagnostics. In contrast, the underlying diseases in chronic dyspnea are bronchial asthma, chronic obstructive airway diseases, heart failure and a combination of obesity and deconditioning in up to 85 % of all cases. The differential diagnosis needs a structured approach including anamnestic and medical technical methods, aiming an efficient differentiation of cardiac and pulmonary causes. As a high number of patients suffer from more than one significant disease, the differential diagnostic assessment needs to be focused on the assessment of the predominant cause of the dyspnea. For this purpose, exercise tests provide helpful algorithms to answer this question.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCritical CareDiagnosis, DifferentialDyspneaHumansLung DiseasesSymptom Assessment

Identifiers

PMID26078046
OpenAlexW2462327349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.