Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26078039›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2015

Preening as a Vehicle for Key Bacteria in Hoopoes.

Ángela Martínez-García, Juan J Soler, Sonia M Rodríguez-Ruano, Manuel Martínez-Bueno, Antonio Manuel Martín-Platero, Natalia Juárez-García, Manuel Martín-Vivaldi

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ángela Martínez-GarcíaEstación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC), E-04120, Almería, Spain. angela@eeza.csic.es.
Juan J SolerEstación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC), E-04120, Almería, Spain.
Sonia M Rodríguez-RuanoDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, E-18071, Granada, Spain.
Manuel Martínez-BuenoDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, E-18071, Granada, Spain.
Antonio Manuel Martín-PlateroDepartamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Granada, E-18071, Granada, Spain.
Natalia Juárez-García, C/Badolatosa 50, 41560, Estepa, Sevilla, Spain.
Manuel Martín-VivaldiDepartamento de Zoología, Universidad de Granada, E-18071, Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESEstacion Experimental de Zonas Aridas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oily secretions produced in the uropygial gland of incubating female hoopoes contain antimicrobial-producing bacteria that prevent feathers from degradation and eggs from pathogenic infection. Using the beak, females collect the uropygial gland secretion and smear it directly on the eggshells and brood patch. Thus, some bacterial strains detected in the secretion should also be present on the eggshell, beak, and brood patch. To characterize these bacterial communities, we used Automatic Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis (ARISA), which distinguishes between taxonomically different bacterial strains (i.e. different operational taxonomic units [OTUs]) by the size of the sequence amplified. We identified a total of 146 different OTUs with sizes between 139 and 999 bp. Of these OTUs, 124 were detected in the uropygial oil, 106 on the beak surface, 97 on the brood patch, and 98 on the eggshell. The highest richness of OTUs appeared in the uropygial oil samples. Moreover, the detection of some OTUs on the beak, brood patch, and eggshells of particular nests depended on these OTUs being present in the uropygial oil of the female. These results agree with the hypothesis that symbiotic bacteria are transmitted from the uropygial gland to beak, brood patch, and eggshell surfaces, opening the possibility that the bacterial community of the secretion plays a central role in determining the communities of special hoopoe eggshell structures (i.e., crypts) that, soon after hatching, are filled with uropygial oil, thereby protecting embryos from pathogens.

Indexed as

GroomingAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial LoadBirdsEgg ShellFeathersFemalePrevalenceSpecies SpecificitySymbiosisAnti-Bacterial AgentsARISAHoopoePreeningSymbiotic bacteriaUropygial glandUropygial oil

Identifiers

PMID26078039
OpenAlexW1853185114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.