Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26077875›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2015

Understandings of genomic research in developing countries: a qualitative study of the views of MalariaGEN participants in Mali.

Karim Traore, Susan Bull, Alassane Niare, Salimata Konate, Mahamadou A Thera, Dominic Kwiatkowski, Michael Parker, Ogobara K Doumbo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karim TraoreMalaria Research and Training Center, DEAP/FMPOS, UMI3189, Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako, BP 1805, Bamako, Mali. karim@icermali.org.
Susan BullThe Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK. susan.bull@ethox.ox.ac.uk.
Alassane NiareMalaria Research and Training Center, DEAP/FMPOS, UMI3189, Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako, BP 1805, Bamako, Mali. flanyalass@yahoo.fr.
Salimata KonateMalaria Research and Training Center, DEAP/FMPOS, UMI3189, Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako, BP 1805, Bamako, Mali. sakonate@icermali.org.
Mahamadou A TheraMalaria Research and Training Center, DEAP/FMPOS, UMI3189, Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako, BP 1805, Bamako, Mali. mthera@icermali.org.
Dominic KwiatkowskiWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK. dominic@well.ox.ac.uk.
Michael ParkerThe Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK. Michael.parker@ethox.ox.ac.uk.
Ogobara K DoumboMalaria Research and Training Center, DEAP/FMPOS, UMI3189, Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako, BP 1805, Bamako, Mali. okd@icermali.org.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600718Medical Research Council MR/M006212/1Wellcome Trust 087285Wellcome Trust 090532/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 090770Wellcome Trust 090770/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 096527Wellcome Trust 098051Wellcome Trust WT077383/Z/05/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObtaining informed consent for participation in genomic research in low-income settings presents specific ethical issues requiring attention. These include the challenges that arise when providing information about unfamiliar and technical research methods, the implications of complicated infrastructure and data sharing requirements, and the potential consequences of future research with samples and data. This study investigated researchers' and participants' parents' experiences of a consent process and understandings of a genome-wide association study of malaria involving children aged five and under in Mali. It aimed to inform best practices in recruiting participants into genomic research.

methodsA qualitative rapid ethical assessment was undertaken. Fifty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted with the parents of research participants. An additional nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with senior research scientists, research assistants and with a member of an ethics committee. A focus group with five parents of research participants and direct observations of four consent processes were also conducted. French and translated English transcripts were descriptively and thematically coded using OpenCode software.

resultsParticipants' parents in the MalariaGEN study had differing understandings of the causes of malaria, the rationale for collecting blood samples, the purposes of the study and the kinds of information the study would generate. Genomic aspects of the research, including the gene/environment interaction underlying susceptibility or resistance to severe malaria, proved particularly challenging to explain and understand.

conclusionsThis study identifies a number of areas to be addressed in the design of consent processes for genomic research, some of which require careful ethical analysis. These include determining how much information should be provided about differing aspects of the research and how best to promote understandings of genomic research. We conclude that it is important to build capacity in the design and conduct of effective and appropriate consent processes for genomic research in low and middle-income settings. Additionally, consideration should be given to the role of review committees and community consultation activities in protecting the interests of participants in genomic research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchComprehensionDeveloping CountriesGenomicsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInformed ConsentAdultChild, PreschoolEthics, ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsGenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansInfantInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID26077875
PMCPMC4469103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.