Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26077464›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2015

The immune response in cancer: from immunology to pathology to immunotherapy.

Nicolas A Giraldo, Etienne Becht, Yann Vano, Catherine Sautès-Fridman, Wolf H Fridman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Messenger RNA ofSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Aging · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The clinical role of the TME in solid cancer.British journal of cancer · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicolas A GiraldoCordeliers Research Center, Team 13 Cancer, immune control and escape, INSERM, UMR_S 1138, 75006, Paris, France, nicolasgiraldocas@gmail.com.
Etienne Becht
Yann Vano
Catherine Sautès-Fridman
Wolf H Fridman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the recent years, breakthrough advances in the characterization of the tumor-infiltrating immune cells and in the understanding of their influence on tumor invasion and metastasis have been accomplished. These studies have allowed the development of assays quantifying immune infiltrates to predict patient's clinical outcome. Increasing evidence supports their utility as prognostic and potentially teragnostic markers. The in-depth characterization of the tumor's immune profile and the standard histopathological criteria are becoming the optimal method of tumor classification in the era of personalized medicine. This review describes the major concepts in the anti-tumor immunity field, with particular focus on the tumor immune microenvironment and the delicate balance between inflammatory and anti-tumor immune responses, its importance as a prognostic tool, and its utility as a teragnostic marker for patients receiving new-generation immunotherapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsTumor EscapeTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.