Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26077316›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2016

Use of mechanistic data in the IARC evaluations of the carcinogenicity of polychlorinated biphenyls and related compounds.

Béatrice Lauby-Secretan, Dana Loomis, Robert Baan, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Véronique Bouvard, Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa, Neela Guha, Yann Grosse, Kurt Straif

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Exposure to 3,3',4,4',5-Pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB126) Causes Widespread DNA Hypomethylation in Adult Zebrafish Testis.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022
    Article
  7. Key Characteristics of Cardiovascular Toxicants.Environmental health perspectives · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. PCB Emissions from Paint Colorants.Environmental science & technology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Béatrice Lauby-SecretanInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Section of the IARC Monographs, 150, cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, Cedex 08, France. secretanb@iarc.fr.
Dana LoomisInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Section of the IARC Monographs, 150, cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, Cedex 08, France.
Robert BaanInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Section of the IARC Monographs, 150, cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, Cedex 08, France.
Fatiha El GhissassiInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Section of the IARC Monographs, 150, cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, Cedex 08, France.
Véronique BouvardInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Section of the IARC Monographs, 150, cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, Cedex 08, France.
Lamia Benbrahim-TallaaInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Section of the IARC Monographs, 150, cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, Cedex 08, France.
Neela GuhaInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Section of the IARC Monographs, 150, cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, Cedex 08, France.
Yann GrosseInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Section of the IARC Monographs, 150, cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, Cedex 08, France.
Kurt StraifInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Section of the IARC Monographs, 150, cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, Cedex 08, France.
Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FR

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The IARC Monographs are a series of scientific reviews that identify environmental factors that can increase the risk of cancer in humans. In its first part, the principles and procedures of the IARC Monographs evaluations are summarized. In a second part, we present the most recent IARC evaluation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs), performed in February 2013: PCBs and dioxin-like PCBs were both classified into group 1 "carcinogens," while PBBs were evaluated as "probably carcinogenic to humans" (group 2A). Noteworthy is that the relative contributions of different PCB congeners to the carcinogenicity of PCB mixtures are not known. The use of mechanistic data for the classification into a higher category is discussed in the context of the history of the consecutive evaluations of several related polychlorinated compounds.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinogensHumansNeoplasmsPolychlorinated BiphenylsToxicologyCarcinogensPolychlorinated BiphenylsCancer bioassaysCarcinogenicityEpidemiologyGenotoxicityHazard identificationReceptor-mediated effects

Identifiers

PMID26077316
OpenAlexW1125583372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.