ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015
Mutation landscape of acquired cross-resistance to glycopeptide and β-lactam antibiotics in Enterococcus faecium.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel antimicrobial strategies for diabetic foot infections: addressing challenges and resistance.Acta diabetologica · 2025Review
- Pheromone Activity after Stimulation with Ampicillin in a Plasmid-FreeMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Multidrug Resistance (MDR) and Collateral Sensitivity in Bacteria, with Special Attention to Genetic and Evolutionary Aspects and to the Perspectives of Antimicrobial Peptides-A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- L,D-Transpeptidase Specific Probe Reveals Spatial Activity of Peptidoglycan Cross-Linking.ACS chemical biology · 2019Article
- T-cell receptor mimic (TCRm) antibody therapeutics against intracellular proteins.Antibody therapeutics · 2019Review
- Comprehensive antibiotic-linked mutation assessment by resistance mutation sequencing (RM-seq).Genome medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Bypass of the d,d-transpeptidase activity of penicillin-binding proteins by an l,d-transpeptidase (Ldtfm) results in resistance to ampicillin and glycopeptides in Enterococcus faecium M9, a mutant obtained by nine consecutive selection steps. Resistance requires activation of a cryptic locus for production of the essential tetrapeptide-containing substrate of Ldtfm and impaired activity of protein phosphatase StpA. Here, whole-genome sequencing revealed a high mutation rate for the entire selection procedure (79 mutations in 900 generations). Acquisition of a mutation in the mismatch repair gene mutL had little impact on the frequency of rifampin-resistant mutants although the mutation spectrum of M9 was typical of impaired MutL with high transversion to transition (40/11) and substitution to deletion (51/28) ratios. M9 did not mainly accumulate neutral mutations since base substitutions occurred more frequently in coding sequences than expected (χ(2) = 5.0; P < 0.05) and silent mutations were underrepresented (χ(2) = 5.72; P < 0.02). None of the mutations directly affected recognition of the tetrapeptide substrate of Ldtfm by peptidoglycan synthesis enzymes. Instead, mutations appear to remodel regulatory circuits involving two-component regulatory systems and sugar metabolism. The high number of mutations required for activation of the l,d-transpeptidase pathway may strongly limit emergence of cross-resistance to ampicillin and glycopeptides by this mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.