ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2015
PFO Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A whole-exome sequencing study of patent foramen ovale: investigating genetic variants and their association with cardiovascular disorders.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Article
- The Pandora's Box of Cardiac Devices: A Case of Infective Endocarditis Postpatent Foramen Ovale Closure.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common finding in the general population and has been theorized to be a mechanism for ischemic stroke primarily due to a deep venous thrombus embolizing through the shunt into the arterial circulation. There has been much debate regarding the association between PFO and stroke, especially in the case of a cryptogenic stroke (i.e., stroke of unknown etiology) in a younger patient without other risk factors. Traditionally, when a PFO is detected, antithrombotic therapy to mitigate risk of a future ischemic event has been the mainstay of treatment. More recently, both surgical and transcatheter closure of a PFO have been widely utilized. However, there are only few randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of PFO closure for stroke prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26076907What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.