Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26076683›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2015

Assessed occupational exposure to chlorinated, aromatic and Stoddard solvents during pregnancy and risk of fetal growth restriction.

Tania A Desrosiers, Christina C Lawson, Robert E Meyer, Patricia A Stewart, Martha A Waters, Adolfo Correa, Andrew F Olshan, National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tania A DesrosiersDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Christina C LawsonNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Robert E MeyerNorth Carolina Division of Public Health, Birth Defects Monitoring Program, State Centre for Health Statistics, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Patricia A StewartStewart Exposure Assessments, LLC, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Martha A WatersNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Adolfo CorreaDepartments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Centre, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Andrew F OlshanDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
National Birth Defects Prevention Study
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNorth Carolina Division of Public Health · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
North Carolina Birth Defects Study To Evaluate Pregnancy Exposures (NC BD-STEPS)U01DD001036 · DD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI OLSHAN, ANDREW · 2013 to 2017
$3.5M
ACL HHS U01DD001036Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCBDD CDC HHS 5U01DD001036NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001036NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924PHS HHS 200-2000-08018PHS HHS U50CCU422096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrevious experimental and epidemiological research suggests that maternal exposure to some organic solvents during pregnancy may increase the risk of fetal growth restriction (FGR). We evaluated the association between expert-assessed occupational solvent exposure and risk of small for gestational age (SGA) infants in a population-based sample of women in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

methodsWe analysed data from 2886 mothers and their infants born between 1997 and 2002. Job histories were self-reported. Probability of exposure to six chlorinated, three aromatic and one petroleum solvent was assessed by industrial hygienists. SGA was defined as birthweight<10th centile of birthweight-by-gestational age in a national reference. Logistic regression was used to estimate ORs and 95% CIs to assess the association between SGA and exposure to any solvent(s) or specific solvent classes, adjusting for maternal age and education.

resultsApproximately 8% of infants were SGA. Exposure prevalence to any solvent was 10% and 8% among mothers of SGA and non-SGA infants, respectively. Among women with ≥ 50% probability of exposure, we observed elevated but imprecise associations between SGA and exposure to any solvent(s) (1.71; 0.86 to 3.40), chlorinated solvents (1.70; 0.69 to 4.01) and aromatic solvents (1.87; 0.78 to 4.50).

conclusionsThis is the first population-based study in the USA to investigate the potential association between FGR and assessed maternal occupational exposure to distinct classes of organic solvents during pregnancy. The potential associations observed between SGA and exposure to chlorinated and aromatic solvents are based on small numbers and merit further investigation.

Indexed as

Birth WeightInfant, Small for Gestational AgeAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleFetal Growth RetardationGestational AgeHalogenationHumansHydrocarbonsInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsMaleMaternal AgeMaternal ExposureOccupational ExposureHydrocarbonsSolventsStoddard solvent

Identifiers

PMID26076683
PMCPMC4572733
OpenAlexW2126066058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.