Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26076135›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Chronic Pain in the Japanese Community--Prevalence, Characteristics and Impact on Quality of Life.

Shinsuke Inoue, Fumio Kobayashi, Makoto Nishihara, Young-Chang P Arai, Tatsunori Ikemoto, Takashi Kawai, Masayuki Inoue, Tomomi Hasegawa, Takahiro Ushida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shinsuke InoueMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Yazako Karimata, Nagakuteshi, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Fumio KobayashiDepartment of Health and Psychosocial Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Yazako Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Makoto NishiharaMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Yazako Karimata, Nagakuteshi, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Young-Chang P AraiMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Yazako Karimata, Nagakuteshi, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Tatsunori IkemotoInstitute of Physical Fitness, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Yazako Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Takashi KawaiMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Yazako Karimata, Nagakuteshi, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Masayuki InoueInstitute of Physical Fitness, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Yazako Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Tomomi HasegawaDepartment of Health and Psychosocial Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Yazako Karimata, Nagakute, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Takahiro UshidaMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Yazako Karimata, Nagakuteshi, Aichi, 480-1195, Japan.
Aichi Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic pain is recognized as a public health problem that affects the general population physically, psychologically, and socially. However, there is little knowledge about the associated factors of chronic pain, such as the influence of weather, family structure, daily exercise, and work status.

objectivesThis survey had three aims: 1) to estimate the prevalence of chronic pain in Japan, 2) to analyze these associated factors, and 3) to evaluate the social burden due to chronic pain.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional postal survey in a sample of 6000 adults aged ≥20 years. The response rate was 43.8%.

resultsThe mean age of the respondents was 57.7 years (range 20-99 years); 39.3% met the criteria for chronic pain (lasting ≥3 months). Approximately a quarter of the respondents reported that their chronic pain was adversely influenced by bad weather and also oncoming bad weather. Risk factors for chronic pain, as determined by a logistic regression model, included being an older female, being unemployed, living alone, and no daily exercise. Individuals with chronic pain showed significantly lower quality of life and significantly higher psychological distress scores than those without chronic pain. The mean annual duration of absence from work of working-age respondents was 9.6 days (range 1-365 days).

conclusionsOur findings revealed that high prevalence and severity of chronic pain, associated factors, and significant impact on quality of life in the adult Japanese population. A detailed understanding of factors associated with chronic pain is essential for establishing a management strategy for primary care.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPrevalenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID26076135
PMCPMC4467865
OpenAlexW1543661618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.