Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26076100›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of pharmacology2015

Inter-study variability of preclinical in vivo safety studies and translational exposure-QTc relationships--a PKPD meta-analysis.

V Gotta, F Cools, K van Ammel, D J Gallacher, S A G Visser, F Sannajust, P Morissette, M Danhof, P H van der Graaf

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. In Silico Assessment of Class I Antiarrhythmic Drug Effects onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

V GottaSystems Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Center of Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
F CoolsGlobal Safety Pharmacology, Janssen Research & Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
K van AmmelGlobal Safety Pharmacology, Janssen Research & Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
D J GallacherGlobal Safety Pharmacology, Janssen Research & Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
S A G VisserQuantitative Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics/Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Upper Gwynedd, PA, USA.
F SannajustSALAR-Safety and Exploratory Pharmacology Department/Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Westpoint, PA, USA.
P MorissetteSALAR-Safety and Exploratory Pharmacology Department/Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Westpoint, PA, USA.
M DanhofSystems Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Center of Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
P H van der GraafSystems Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Center of Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePreclinical cardiovascular safety studies (CVS) have been compared between facilities with respect to their sensitivity to detect drug-induced QTc prolongation (ΔQTc). Little is known about the consistency of quantitative ΔQTc predictions that are relevant for translation to humans. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We derived typical ΔQTc predictions at therapeutic exposure (ΔQTcTHER ) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for 3 Kv 11.1 (hERG) channel blockers (moxifloxacin, dofetilide and sotalol) from a total of 14 CVS with variable designs in the conscious dog. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) analysis of each study was followed by a meta-analysis (pooling 2-6 studies including 10-32 dogs per compound) to derive meta-predictions of typical ΔQTcTHER . Meta-predictions were used as a reference to evaluate the consistency of study predictions and to relate results to those found in the clinical literature. KEY

resultsThe 95%CIs of study-predicted ΔQTcTHER comprised in 13 out of 14 cases the meta-prediction. Overall inter-study variability (mean deviation from meta-prediction at upper level of therapeutic exposure) was 30% (range: 1-69%). Meta-ΔQTcTHER predictions for moxifloxacin, dofetilide and sotalol overlapped with reported clinical QTc prolongation when expressed as %-prolongation from baseline. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Consistent exposure-ΔQTc predictions were obtained from single preclinical dog studies of highly variable designs by systematic PKPD analysis, which is suitable for translational purposes. The good preclinical-clinical pharmacodynamic correlations obtained suggest that such an analysis should be more routinely applied to increase the informative and predictive value of results obtained from animal experiments.

Indexed as

AnimalsArrhythmias, CardiacBrugada SyndromeCardiac Conduction System DiseaseDogsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFemaleFluoroquinolonesHeart Conduction SystemHeart RateHumansLong QT SyndromeMaleMoxifloxacinPhenethylaminesdofetilideFluoroquinolonesMoxifloxacinPhenethylaminesPotassium Channel BlockersSotalolSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID26076100
PMCPMC4556474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.