Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26075748›Full record

ArticleOncogenesis2015

An aberrant nuclear localization of E-cadherin is a potent inhibitor of Wnt/β-catenin-elicited promotion of the cancer stem cell phenotype.

Y-J Su, Y-W Chang, W-H Lin, C-L Liang, J-L Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogenesis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Can CD133 Be Regarded as a Prognostic Biomarker in Oncology: Pros and Cons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Working a second job: Cell adhesion proteins that moonlight in the nucleus.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y-J SuInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Y-W ChangInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
W-H Lin1] Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan [2] Department of Orthopedics, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
C-L LiangInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
J-L Lee1] Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan [2] Department of Medical Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
National Tsing Hua University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies suggest that Wnt signaling contributes to reprogramming and maintenance of cancer stem cell (CSC) states activated by loss of membranous E-cadherin expression. However, E-cadherin's exact role in Wnt/β-catenin-mediated promotion of the CSC phenotype remains unclear. Recently, a significant positive correlation has been observed between the expression of nuclear (an aberrant nuclear localization) E-cadherin and β-catenin in gastric and colorectal carcinomas. Here we conducted a series of in-vitro and in-vivo studies to show that the β-catenin/TCF4 interaction was abolished by E-cadherin and was correlated with its nuclear localization, and consequently decreased β-catenin/TCF4 transcriptional activity. Nuclear E-cadherin was a negative regulator of Wnt/β-Catenin-elicited promotion of the CSC phenotype. Using immunohistochemistry on lung cancer tissue microarrays, we found that changes in subcellular location of E-cadherin may be described by tumor grade and stage, suggesting cellular redistribution during lung tumorigenesis. Furthermore, nuclear E-cadherin expression was more significantly inversely correlated with CD133 (a lung CSC marker) expression (P<0.005) than total E-cadherin expression (P<0.05), suggesting that lung cancer as defined by nuclear E-cadherin(Low)/nuclear β-catenin(High)/CD133(High) biomarkers has superior prognostic value over total E-cadherin(Low)/nuclear β-catenin(High)/CD133(High).

Identifiers

PMID26075748
PMCPMC4491612
OpenAlexW1971397164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.