Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26075488›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical psychopharmacology2015

Comparative Ethanol-Induced Potentiation of Stimulatory Responses to Dexmethylphenidate Versus Methylphenidate.

Kennerly S Patrick, Arthur B Straughn, Owen T Reeves, Hilary Bernstein, Robert Malcolm

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Absorption Differences between Immediate-Release Dexmethylphenidate and dl-Methylphenidate.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2016
    Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kennerly S PatrickFrom the *Department of Drug Discovery and Biomedical Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; †Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN; and ‡Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Arthur B Straughn
Owen T Reeves
Hilary Bernstein
Robert Malcolm
Medical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

SOUTH CAROLINA CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SCTR)UL1RR029882 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2009 to 2011
$10.1M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
Methylphenidate-Ethanol Interactions in ADHD and Co-abuseR01AA016707 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI PATRICK, KENNERLY SEXTON · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)TL1RR029881 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2009 to 2011
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR029881NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029882NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016707NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA016707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potentiation of positive subjective responses to immediate-release dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH) or dl-methylphenidate (dl-MPH) by ethanol was investigated over the time course of maximal drug exposure after a single dose. In a 4-way, randomized, crossover study design, 12 men and 12 women normal volunteers received d-MPH (0.15 mg/kg) or dl-MPH (0.3 mg/kg) with or without ethanol (0.6 g/kg). Serial visual analog scales were used as surrogates for drug abuse liability ("high," "good," "like," "stimulated," and "any drug effect"). Combining pure d-MPH with ethanol significantly (P < 0.005) increased the area under the effect curves (AUC(0-5.25h)) of all 5 subscales. The dl-MPH-ethanol combination significantly (P < 0.05) increased these AUCs with the exception of like (P = 0.08). Effects of the pure d-MPH-ethanol combination exhibited delayed potentiation relative to dl-MPH-ethanol. A pharmacokinetic interaction between the l-isomer of dl-MPH and ethanol has previously been shown to increase early exposure to d-MPH. Administration of the pure isomer d-MPH precludes this absorption phase pharmacokinetic interaction with ethanol. This notwithstanding, the pure d-MPH-ethanol combination resulted in comparable, if not greater, cumulative stimulant potentiation than the dl-MPH-ethanol combination. These findings provide evidence of a pharmacodynamic component to d-MPH-ethanol synergistic interactions and carry implications for the rational drug individualization in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Indexed as

AffectCentral Nervous System StimulantsCross-Over StudiesDexmethylphenidate HydrochlorideDrug SynergismEthanolFemaleHumansMaleMethylphenidateCentral Nervous System StimulantsDexmethylphenidate HydrochlorideEthanolMethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID26075488
PMCPMC4485535
OpenAlexW2465837983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.