Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26075093›Full record

ReviewNursing research and practice2015

Disinfection of Needleless Connector Hubs: Clinical Evidence Systematic Review.

Nancy L Moureau, Julie Flynn

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing research and practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03605498 (An Investigation of Novel Technology to Bring Genomic Analysis to the Patient Bedside to Systematically Track and Report on ESKAPE Bacterial Transmission in Today's Operating Room Environments), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03605498 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

An Investigation of Novel Technology to Bring Genomic Analysis to the Patient Bedside to Systematically Track and Report on ESKAPE Bacterial Transmission in Today's Operating Room Environments

TypeobservationalSponsorSundara ReddyRan2017 to 2018Enrolled83ConditionsBacterial Infections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Efficacy of disinfection procedures to reduceInfection prevention in practice · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Nancy L MoureauPICC Excellence, Inc., Online Education, Hartwell, GA 30643, USA ; Greenville Hospital System, Greenville, SC 29605, USA ; Alliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research (AVATAR group) Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia.
Julie FlynnAlliance for Vascular Access Teaching and Research (AVATAR group) Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia ; Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1512-2089
Griffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Needleless connectors (NC) are used on virtually all intravascular devices, providing an easy access point for infusion connection. Colonization of NC is considered the cause of 50% of postinsertion catheter-related infections. Breaks in aseptic technique, from failure to disinfect, result in contamination and subsequent biofilm formation within NC and catheters increasing the potential for infection of central and peripheral catheters. Methods. This systematic review evaluated 140 studies and 34 abstracts on NC disinfection practices, the impact of hub contamination on infection, and measures of education and compliance. Results. The greatest risk for contamination of the catheter after insertion is the NC with 33-45% contaminated, and compliance with disinfection as low as 10%. The optimal technique or disinfection time has not been identified, although scrubbing with 70% alcohol for 5-60 seconds is recommended. Studies have reported statistically significant results in infection reduction when passive alcohol disinfection caps are used (48-86% reduction). Clinical Implications. It is critical for healthcare facilities and clinicians to take responsibility for compliance with basic principles of asepsis compliance, to involve frontline staff in strategies, to facilitate education that promotes understanding of the consequences of failure, and to comply with the standard of care for hub disinfection.

Identifiers

PMID26075093
PMCPMC4446481
OpenAlexW1572295149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.