Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26074892›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Methanogenic archaea and sulfate reducing bacteria co-cultured on acetate: teamwork or coexistence?

Derya Ozuolmez, Hyunsoo Na, Mark A Lever, Kasper U Kjeldsen, Bo B Jørgensen, Caroline M Plugge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A novelISME communications · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Analysis of Mechanisms for Electron Uptake byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Derya OzuolmezAgrotechnology and Food Sciences, Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University Wageningen, Netherlands.
Hyunsoo NaDivision of Microbial Ecology, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria.
Mark A LeverDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich Zürich, Switzerland.
Kasper U KjeldsenCenter for Geomicrobiology, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University Aarhus, Denmark.
Bo B JørgensenCenter for Geomicrobiology, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University Aarhus, Denmark.
Caroline M PluggeAgrotechnology and Food Sciences, Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University Wageningen, Netherlands.
Aarhus University · DKWageningen University & Research · NLBoard of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology · CHUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetate is a major product of fermentation processes and an important substrate for sulfate reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea. Most studies on acetate catabolism by sulfate reducers and methanogens have used pure cultures. Less is known about acetate conversion by mixed pure cultures and the interactions between both groups. We tested interspecies hydrogen transfer and coexistence between marine methanogens and sulfate reducers using mixed pure cultures of two types of microorganisms. First, Desulfovibrio vulgaris subsp. vulgaris (DSM 1744), a hydrogenotrophic sulfate reducer, was cocultured together with the obligate aceticlastic methanogen Methanosaeta concilii using acetate as carbon and energy source. Next, Methanococcus maripaludis S2, an obligate H2- and formate-utilizing methanogen, was used as a partner organism to M. concilii in the presence of acetate. Finally, we performed a coexistence experiment between M. concilii and an acetotrophic sulfate reducer Desulfobacter latus AcSR2. Our results showed that D. vulgaris was able to reduce sulfate and grow from hydrogen leaked by M. concilii. In the other coculture, M. maripaludis was sustained by hydrogen leaked by M. concilii as revealed by qPCR. The growth of the two aceticlastic microbes indicated co-existence rather than competition. Altogether, our results indicate that H2 leaking from M. concilii could be used by efficient H2-scavengers. This metabolic trait, revealed from coculture studies, brings new insight to the metabolic flexibility of methanogens and sulfate reducers residing in marine environments in response to changing environmental conditions and community compositions. Using dedicated physiological studies we were able to unravel the occurrence of less obvious interactions between marine methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Indexed as

DesulfobacterDesulfovibriometabolic flexibilityMethanococcusMethanosaetamicrobial interactions

Identifiers

PMID26074892
PMCPMC4445324
OpenAlexW1601568609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.