Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26074889›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Effect of in-feed administration and withdrawal of tylosin phosphate on antibiotic resistance in enterococci isolated from feedlot steers.

Alicia G Beukers, Rahat Zaheer, Shaun R Cook, Kim Stanford, Alexandre V Chaves, Michael P Ward, Tim A McAllister

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. New microbes and new infections · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genomic Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Antimicrobial Resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alicia G BeukersFaculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia ; Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Rahat ZaheerLethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Shaun R CookLethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Kim StanfordAlberta Agriculture and Rural Development, Lethbridge Research Centre Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Alexandre V ChavesFaculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michael P WardFaculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Tim A McAllisterLethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CAUniversity of Sydney · AULethbridge Research and Development Centre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tylosin phosphate is a macrolide commonly administered to cattle in North America for the control of liver abscesses. This study investigated the effect of in-feed administration of tylosin phosphate to cattle at subtherapeutic levels and its subsequent withdrawal on macrolide resistance using enterococci as an indicator bacterium. Fecal samples were collected from steers that received no antibiotics and steers administered tylosin phosphate (11 ppm) in-feed for 197 days and withdrawn 28 days before slaughter. Enterococcus species isolated from fecal samples were identified through sequencing the groES-EL intergenic spacer region and subject to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, identification of resistance determinants and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiling. Tylosin increased (P < 0.05) the proportion of ery(R) and tyl(R) enterococci within the population. Just prior to its removal, the proportion of ery(R) and tyl(R) resistant enterococci began decreasing and continued to decrease after tylosin was withdrawn from the diet until there was no difference (P > 0.05) between treatments on d 225. This suggests that antibiotic withdrawal prior to slaughter contributes to a reduction in the proportion of macrolide resistant enterococci entering the food chain. Among the 504 enterococci isolates characterized, Enterococcus hirae was found to predominate (n = 431), followed by Enterococcus villorum (n = 32), Enterococcus faecium (n = 21), Enterococcus durans (n = 7), Enterococcus casseliflavus (n = 4), Enterococcus mundtii (n = 4), Enterococcus gallinarum (n = 3), Enterococcus faecalis (n = 1), and Enterococcus thailandicus (n = 1). The diversity of enterococci was greater in steers at arrival than at exit from the feedlot. Erythromycin resistant isolates harbored the erm(B) and/or msrC gene. Similar PFGE profiles of ery(R) E. hirae pre- and post-antibiotic treatment suggest that increased abundance of ery(R) enterococci after administration of tylosin phosphate reflects selection for strains that were already present within the gastrointestinal tract of cattle at arrival.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancebeef cattleenterococcierythromycinsubtherapeutic macrolidestylosin

Identifiers

PMID26074889
PMCPMC4444845
OpenAlexW1495390285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.