Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26074781›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2015

Automatic target validation based on neuroscientific literature mining for tractography.

Xavier Vasques, Renaud Richardet, Sean L Hill, David Slater, Jean-Cedric Chappelier, Etienne Pralong, Jocelyne Bloch, Bogdan Draganski, Laura Cif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The brainstem connectome database.Scientific data · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xavier VasquesBlue Brain Project, Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland ; IBM Systems France ; Laboratoire de Recherche en Neurosciences Cliniques France.
Renaud RichardetBlue Brain Project, Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sean L HillBlue Brain Project, Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
David SlaterLaboratoire de Recherche Neuroimagerie, Université de Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland ; Département des Neurosciences Cliniques, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Cedric ChappelierSchool of Computer and Communication Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Etienne PralongDépartement des Neurosciences Cliniques, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jocelyne BlochDépartement des Neurosciences Cliniques, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bogdan DraganskiLaboratoire de Recherche Neuroimagerie, Université de Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland ; Département des Neurosciences Cliniques, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laura CifLaboratoire de Recherche Neuroimagerie, Université de Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland ; Département des Neurosciences Cliniques, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland ; Département de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Montpellier, Université Montpellier 1 Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Target identification for tractography studies requires solid anatomical knowledge validated by an extensive literature review across species for each seed structure to be studied. Manual literature review to identify targets for a given seed region is tedious and potentially subjective. Therefore, complementary approaches would be useful. We propose to use text-mining models to automatically suggest potential targets from the neuroscientific literature, full-text articles and abstracts, so that they can be used for anatomical connection studies and more specifically for tractography. We applied text-mining models to three structures: two well-studied structures, since validated deep brain stimulation targets, the internal globus pallidus and the subthalamic nucleus and, the nucleus accumbens, an exploratory target for treating psychiatric disorders. We performed a systematic review of the literature to document the projections of the three selected structures and compared it with the targets proposed by text-mining models, both in rat and primate (including human). We ran probabilistic tractography on the nucleus accumbens and compared the output with the results of the text-mining models and literature review. Overall, text-mining the literature could find three times as many targets as two man-weeks of curation could. The overall efficiency of the text-mining against literature review in our study was 98% recall (at 36% precision), meaning that over all the targets for the three selected seeds, only one target has been missed by text-mining. We demonstrate that connectivity for a structure of interest can be extracted from a very large amount of publications and abstracts. We believe this tool will be useful in helping the neuroscience community to facilitate connectivity studies of particular brain regions. The text mining tools used for the study are part of the HBP Neuroinformatics Platform, publicly available at http://connectivity-brainer.rhcloud.com/.

Indexed as

globus pallidus internusinformation extractionnatural language processingnucleus accumbenssubthalamic nucleustext miningtractography

Identifiers

PMID26074781
PMCPMC4445321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.