ArticleInternational wound journal2013
Evaluation of a peer-led self-management education programme PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You.
Article in International wound journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04395521 (A Facebook Group-based Program for Foot Self-management Support of Adults With Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Facebook Group-based Program for Foot Self-management Support of Adults With Diabetes Mellitus: A Feasibility Study in Canada
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improvements in lower-limb muscle strength and foot pressure distribution with foot care in frail elderly adults: a randomized controlled trial from Japan.BMC geriatrics · 2019Trial
- Review
- Article
- The effect of peer group on self-care behaviors and glycemic index in elders with type II diabetes.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Reaching out to diabetic soles: Outreach foot care pilot project.SAGE open medicine · 2018Article
- Cytokine balance and behavioral intervention; findings from the Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-Management (PALS) project.Human immunology · 2017Article
- Effective Self-Management Interventions for Patients With Lupus: Potential Impact of Peer Mentoring.The American journal of the medical sciences · 2017Review
- Prevent Wounds by Conducting a Comprehensive Foot Examination and Intervention.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Article
- Evaluation of a peer-led self-management education programme PEP Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You.International wound journal · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PEP (Peer Education Programme) Talk: Diabetes, Healthy Feet and You is a peer-led self-management programme developed to address the problems of growing prevalence of diabetes and its complications, and limited health care dollars. An evaluation of the programme, how it might be situated within a public health perspective and potential bridges for its implementation in communities throughout Canada and worldwide, are presented. The programme consisted of workshops that were conducted by volunteer peer leaders and health care professionals in 12 communities in 10 Canadian provinces; the volunteers were supported through monthly mentoring teleconferences, on-line tips and discussion board conversations. A web portal was developed to be used by the team, volunteers and community participants. Workshop curriculum was developed based on diabetes footcare and self-management best practise guidelines. Community participants answered pre-and post-workshop statements that indicated that learning occurred, as indicated by an increase in the number of statements answered correctly. Participants' feedback about the workshops was positive. In telephone follow-up interviews, 97% of respondents reported having changed their foot self-management behaviours. The portal was commonly used according to website visits, but not as much as expected for registration of community participants. It is recommended that this programme be made widely available and tailored to the specific needs of the communities and that further evaluation be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.