Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26073260›Full record

ReviewFEBS letters2015

Functional advantages of dynamic protein disorder.

Rebecca B Berlow, H Jane Dyson, Peter E Wright

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEBS letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Comparative assessment of binding residue predictions in intrinsically disordered regions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of predictions of disordered binding regions in the CAID2 experiment.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Driving forces of the complex formation between highly charged disordered proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Fluid protein fold space and its implications.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca B BerlowDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology and Skaggs Institute of Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
H Jane DysonDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology and Skaggs Institute of Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Peter E WrightDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology and Skaggs Institute of Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: wright@scripps.edu.

Funding

STRUCTURE AND STABILITY OF IKB/NF-KB COMPLEXESP01GM071862 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KOMIVES, ELIZABETH A. · 2006 to 2016
$14.9M
Structural basis for CBP/p300 transcriptional regulationR01CA096865 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WRIGHT, PETER EDWIN · 2002 to 2016
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA096865NCI NIH HHS R01 CA096865NIGMS NIH HHS GM71862NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM071862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins participate in many important cellular regulatory processes. The absence of a well-defined structure in the free state of a disordered domain, and even on occasion when it is bound to physiological partners, is fundamental to its function. Disordered domains are frequently the location of multiple sites for post-translational modification, the key element of metabolic control in the cell. When a disordered domain folds upon binding to a partner, the resulting complex buries a far greater surface area than in an interaction of comparably-sized folded proteins, thus maximizing specificity at modest protein size. Disorder also maintains accessibility of sites for post-translational modification. Because of their inherent plasticity, disordered domains frequently adopt entirely different structures when bound to different partners, increasing the repertoire of available interactions without the necessity for expression of many different proteins. This feature also adds to the faithfulness of cellular regulation, as the availability of a given disordered domain depends on competition between various partners relevant to different cellular processes.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceHumansIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsCoupled folding and bindingPost-translational modificationTranscriptional activation

Identifiers

PMID26073260
PMCPMC4586362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.