Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2607307›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health1989

Feasibility of studying subfertility using retrospective self reports.

M Joffe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Validity of self-reported time to pregnancy.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2009
    Article
  7. Time To Pregnancy and occupational lead exposure.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2003
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Detection of agents causing genetic or reproductive damage.British journal of industrial medicine · 1992
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M JoffeSt Mary's Hospital Medical School, London.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During an investigation of possible reproductive effects of environmental agents, 261 male and 155 female workers were interviewed concerning subfertility at some time in the past: the time taken to conceive, for all births; and the occurrence of one or more fertile phases lasting for 6 months or more. When these two variables were compared, the quality of reporting was acceptable in 89.7% of instances, and data editing enabled accuracy to be improved. Reporting was more reliable with shorter duration of recall, and female workers' reports were somewhat more reliable than those of male workers. The distribution of time taken to conceive was similar for male workers to that observed in previously published prospective series, though with a higher estimate of subfertility when infertile phases were also considered. Comparison with published estimates of reduced fertility appeared to be reassuring. As predicted, the equivalent comparisons for female workers showed the presence of a strong selection effect.

Indexed as

Data CollectionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfertility, FemaleInfertility, MaleMaleMental RecallOccupational DiseasesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID2607307
PMCPMC1052848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.