Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26072906›Full record

ArticleJournal of educational evaluation for health professions2015

Comparison of the knowledge, attitudes, and perception of barriers regarding adverse drug reaction reporting between pharmacy and medical students in Pakistan.

Muhammad Umair Khan, Akram Ahmad, Areeba Ejaz, Syed Ata Rizvi, Ayesha Sardar, Kazim Hussain, Tayyaba Zaffar, Shazia Q Jamshed

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in Primary Care Settings in Kuwait: A Comparative Study of Physicians and Pharmacists.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2018
    Article
  11. Adverse drug reaction reporting among physicians working in private and government hospitals in Kuwait.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad Umair KhanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-9553-9874
Akram AhmadDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9998-5860
Areeba EjazDepartment of Paediatrics, Civil Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4085-461X
Syed Ata RizviFaculty of Pharmacy, Hamdard University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9886-7192
Ayesha SardarDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9476-021X
Kazim HussainFaculty of Pharmacy, Hamdard University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1315-6541
Tayyaba ZaffarDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shazia Q JamshedDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Kulliyyah of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan Campus, Kuantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0773-0463
Dow University of Health Sciences · PKHamdard University · PKUCSI University · MYCivil Hospital Karachi · PKInternational Islamic University Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goal of this study was to compare the knowledge and attitudes of pharmacy and medical students regarding adverse drug reactions (ADRs), as well as their perceptions of barriers to ADR reporting, in a Higher Education Commission-recognised Pakistani university.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among final-year pharmacy (n=91) and medical (n=108) students in Pakistan from June 1 to July 31, 2014. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. The responses of pharmacy students were compared to those of medical students.

resultsPharmacy students had a significantly better knowledge of ADRs than medical students (mean±SD, 5.61±1.78 vs. 3.23±1.60; P<0.001). Gender showed a significant relationship to knowledge about ADRs, and male participants were apparently more knowledgeable than their female counterparts (P<0.001). The attitudes of pharmacy students regarding their capability to handle and report ADRs were significantly more positive than those of medical students (P<0.05). In comparison to pharmacy students, a lack of knowledge of where and how to report ADRs was the main barrier that medical students perceived to ADR reporting (P=0.001).

conclusionFinal-year pharmacy students exhibited more knowledge about ADRs and showed more positive attitudes regarding their capacity to handle and report ADRs than final-year medical students.

Indexed as

ComparisonMedicalPakistanPharmacovigilancePharmacyStudents

Identifiers

PMID26072906
PMCPMC4536349
OpenAlexW1769083393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.