Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26072504›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015

Exploiting ontology graph for predicting sparsely annotated gene function.

Sheng Wang, Hyunghoon Cho, ChengXiang Zhai, Bonnie Berger, Jian Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Graph Neural Network-Based Approaches for Protein Function Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sheng WangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA and Department of Mathematics, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Hyunghoon ChoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA and Department of Mathematics, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
ChengXiang ZhaiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA and Department of Mathematics, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Bonnie BergerDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA and Department of Mathematics, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA and Department of Mathematics, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jian PengDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA and Department of Mathematics, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

TRAININGU54GM114838 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SINHA, SAURABH, SONG, JUN S · 2014 to 2017
$10.8M
Structure-Based Prediction of the InteractomeR01GM081871 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BERGER, BONNIE · 2008 to 2020
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1U54GM114838NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081871NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM114838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSystematically predicting gene (or protein) function based on molecular interaction networks has become an important tool in refining and enhancing the existing annotation catalogs, such as the Gene Ontology (GO) database. However, functional labels with only a few (<10) annotated genes, which constitute about half of the GO terms in yeast, mouse and human, pose a unique challenge in that any prediction algorithm that independently considers each label faces a paucity of information and thus is prone to capture non-generalizable patterns in the data, resulting in poor predictive performance. There exist a variety of algorithms for function prediction, but none properly address this 'overfitting' issue of sparsely annotated functions, or do so in a manner scalable to tens of thousands of functions in the human catalog.

resultsWe propose a novel function prediction algorithm, clusDCA, which transfers information between similar functional labels to alleviate the overfitting problem for sparsely annotated functions. Our method is scalable to datasets with a large number of annotations. In a cross-validation experiment in yeast, mouse and human, our method greatly outperformed previous state-of-the-art function prediction algorithms in predicting sparsely annotated functions, without sacrificing the performance on labels with sufficient information. Furthermore, we show that our method can accurately predict genes that will be assigned a functional label that has no known annotations, based only on the ontology graph structure and genes associated with other labels, which further suggests that our method effectively utilizes the similarity between gene functions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/wangshenguiuc/clusDCA.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene OntologyMolecular Sequence AnnotationAnimalsComputational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMiceProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsVocabulary, ControlledProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26072504
PMCPMC4542782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.