ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015
Gene network inference by fusing data from diverse distributions.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- SAILoR: Structure-Aware Inference of Logic Rules.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Gemini: memory-efficient integration of hundreds of gene networks with high-order pooling.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- A guide to multi-omics data collection and integration for translational medicine.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Review and assessment of Boolean approaches for inference of gene regulatory networks.Heliyon · 2022Review
- Where Do We Stand in Regularization for Life Science Studies?Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2022Article
- Unsupervised Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods: A Comprehensive Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Article
- Integrated Multi-Omics Analyses in Oncology: A Review of Machine Learning Methods and Tools.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Machine Learning for Integrating Data in Biology and Medicine: Principles, Practice, and Opportunities.An international journal on information fusion · 2019Article
- Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation of a Bayesian mixture model for gene network inference.Genes & genomics · 2019Article
- Review of Causal Discovery Methods Based on Graphical Models.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Random Matrix Analysis for Gene Interaction Networks in Cancer Cells.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Network analysis for count data with excess zeros.BMC genetics · 2017Article
- Disentangling Interactions in the Microbiome: A Network Perspective.Trends in microbiology · 2017Review
- COLLECTIVE PAIRWISE CLASSIFICATION FOR MULTI-WAY ANALYSIS OF DISEASE AND DRUG DATA.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationMarkov networks are undirected graphical models that are widely used to infer relations between genes from experimental data. Their state-of-the-art inference procedures assume the data arise from a Gaussian distribution. High-throughput omics data, such as that from next generation sequencing, often violates this assumption. Furthermore, when collected data arise from multiple related but otherwise nonidentical distributions, their underlying networks are likely to have common features. New principled statistical approaches are needed that can deal with different data distributions and jointly consider collections of datasets.
resultsWe present FuseNet, a Markov network formulation that infers networks from a collection of nonidentically distributed datasets. Our approach is computationally efficient and general: given any number of distributions from an exponential family, FuseNet represents model parameters through shared latent factors that define neighborhoods of network nodes. In a simulation study, we demonstrate good predictive performance of FuseNet in comparison to several popular graphical models. We show its effectiveness in an application to breast cancer RNA-sequencing and somatic mutation data, a novel application of graphical models. Fusion of datasets offers substantial gains relative to inference of separate networks for each dataset. Our results demonstrate that network inference methods for non-Gaussian data can help in accurate modeling of the data generated by emergent high-throughput technologies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code is at https://github.com/marinkaz/fusenet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.