Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26072487›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015

Gene network inference by fusing data from diverse distributions.

Marinka Žitnik, Blaž Zupan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A guide to multi-omics data collection and integration for translational medicine.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Where Do We Stand in Regularization for Life Science Studies?Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. COLLECTIVE PAIRWISE CLASSIFICATION FOR MULTI-WAY ANALYSIS OF DISEASE AND DRUG DATA.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marinka ŽitnikFaculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Blaž ZupanFaculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

PROJECT III - Computational Analysis of Phenotypes andP01HD039691 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SUCGANG, RICHARD · 2001 to 2016
$14.4M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD039691NICHD NIH HHS P01-HD39691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMarkov networks are undirected graphical models that are widely used to infer relations between genes from experimental data. Their state-of-the-art inference procedures assume the data arise from a Gaussian distribution. High-throughput omics data, such as that from next generation sequencing, often violates this assumption. Furthermore, when collected data arise from multiple related but otherwise nonidentical distributions, their underlying networks are likely to have common features. New principled statistical approaches are needed that can deal with different data distributions and jointly consider collections of datasets.

resultsWe present FuseNet, a Markov network formulation that infers networks from a collection of nonidentically distributed datasets. Our approach is computationally efficient and general: given any number of distributions from an exponential family, FuseNet represents model parameters through shared latent factors that define neighborhoods of network nodes. In a simulation study, we demonstrate good predictive performance of FuseNet in comparison to several popular graphical models. We show its effectiveness in an application to breast cancer RNA-sequencing and somatic mutation data, a novel application of graphical models. Fusion of datasets offers substantial gains relative to inference of separate networks for each dataset. Our results demonstrate that network inference methods for non-Gaussian data can help in accurate modeling of the data generated by emergent high-throughput technologies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code is at https://github.com/marinkaz/fusenet.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMarkov ChainsPoisson DistributionSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID26072487
PMCPMC4542780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.