ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015
Adapt-Mix: learning local genetic correlation structure improves summary statistics-based analyses.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The goldmine of GWAS summary statistics: a systematic review of methods and tools.BioData mining · 2024Article
- Fine Scale Genomic Signals of Admixture and Alien Introgression among Asian Rice Landraces.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- The critical needs and challenges for genetic architecture studies in Africa.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2018Review
- Proper joint analysis of summary association statistics requires the adjustment of heterogeneity in SNP coverage pattern.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Dissecting the genetics of complex traits using summary association statistics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2017Review
- Genetics and Genomics of Coronary Artery Disease.Current cardiology reports · 2016Review
- Transethnic Genetic-Correlation Estimates from Summary Statistics.American journal of human genetics · 2016Article
- JEPEGMIX: gene-level joint analysis of functional SNPs in cosmopolitan cohorts.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationApproaches to identifying new risk loci, training risk prediction models, imputing untyped variants and fine-mapping causal variants from summary statistics of genome-wide association studies are playing an increasingly important role in the human genetics community. Current summary statistics-based methods rely on global 'best guess' reference panels to model the genetic correlation structure of the dataset being studied. This approach, especially in admixed populations, has the potential to produce misleading results, ignores variation in local structure and is not feasible when appropriate reference panels are missing or small. Here, we develop a method, Adapt-Mix, that combines information across all available reference panels to produce estimates of local genetic correlation structure for summary statistics-based methods in arbitrary populations.
resultsWe applied Adapt-Mix to estimate the genetic correlation structure of both admixed and non-admixed individuals using simulated and real data. We evaluated our method by measuring the performance of two summary statistics-based methods: imputation and joint-testing. When using our method as opposed to the current standard of 'best guess' reference panels, we observed a 28% decrease in mean-squared error for imputation and a 73.7% decrease in mean-squared error for joint-testing. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our method is publicly available in a software package called ADAPT-Mix available at https://github.com/dpark27/adapt_mix.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.