ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015
cNMA: a framework of encounter complex-based normal mode analysis to model conformational changes in protein interactions.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- An integrative molecular systems approach unravels mechanisms underlying biphasic nitrate uptake by plant nitrate transporter NRT1.1.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Article
- Approaches to Backbone Flexibility in Protein-Protein Docking.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Assessment of Protein-Protein Docking Models Using Deep Learning.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Review
- Modeling protein-nucleic acid complexes with extremely large conformational changes using Flex-LZerD.Proteomics · 2023Article
- Advances to tackle backbone flexibility in protein docking.Current opinion in structural biology · 2021Review
- Article
- Protein Docking Model Evaluation by Graph Neural Networks.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Bayesian Active Learning for Optimization and Uncertainty Quantification in Protein Docking.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2020Article
- Article
- Enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross-docking within the protein-protein docking server SwarmDock.Proteins · 2020Article
- Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Extracellular Domains I and II of cell-surface glycoprotein CD44 mediate itsThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Article
- Flexible Backbone Assembly and Refinement of Symmetrical Homomeric Complexes.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2019Article
- Survey of the analysis of continuous conformational variability of biological macromolecules by electron microscopy.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2019Review
- Homophilic CD44 Interactions Mediate Tumor Cell Aggregation and Polyclonal Metastasis in Patient-Derived Breast Cancer Models.Cancer discovery · 2019Article
- Efficient flexible backbone protein-protein docking for challenging targets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Human and server docking prediction for CAPRI round 30-35 using LZerD with combined scoring functions.Proteins · 2017Article
- Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationIt remains both a fundamental and practical challenge to understand and anticipate motions and conformational changes of proteins during their associations. Conventional normal mode analysis (NMA) based on anisotropic network model (ANM) addresses the challenge by generating normal modes reflecting intrinsic flexibility of proteins, which follows a conformational selection model for protein-protein interactions. But earlier studies have also found cases where conformational selection alone could not adequately explain conformational changes and other models have been proposed. Moreover, there is a pressing demand of constructing a much reduced but still relevant subset of protein conformational space to improve computational efficiency and accuracy in protein docking, especially for the difficult cases with significant conformational changes. METHOD AND
resultsWith both conformational selection and induced fit models considered, we extend ANM to include concurrent but differentiated intra- and inter-molecular interactions and develop an encounter complex-based NMA (cNMA) framework. Theoretical analysis and empirical results over a large data set of significant conformational changes indicate that cNMA is capable of generating conformational vectors considerably better at approximating conformational changes with contributions from both intrinsic flexibility and inter-molecular interactions than conventional NMA only considering intrinsic flexibility does. The empirical results also indicate that a straightforward application of conventional NMA to an encounter complex often does not improve upon NMA for an individual protein under study and intra- and inter-molecular interactions need to be differentiated properly. Moreover, in addition to induced motions of a protein under study, the induced motions of its binding partner and the coupling between the two sets of protein motions present in a near-native encounter complex lead to the improved performance. A study to isolate and assess the sole contribution of intermolecular interactions toward improvements against conventional NMA further validates the additional benefit from induced-fit effects. Taken together, these results provide new insights into molecular mechanisms underlying protein interactions and new tools for dimensionality reduction for flexible protein docking. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source codes are available upon request.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.