Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26072308›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2015

Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal.

Petra Brhlikova, Ian Harper, Madhusudan Subedi, Samita Bhattarai, Nabin Rawal, Allyson M Pollock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Petra BrhlikovaCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK. pbrhlikova@gmail.com.
Ian HarperSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, 15a George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9LD, UK. ian.harper@ed.ac.uk.
Madhusudan SubediPatan Academy of Health Sciences, Nepal and Central Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal. madhusudansubedi@gmail.com.
Samita BhattaraiNortheastern University, Boston, MA, USA. samitabhattarai@gmail.com.
Nabin RawalCentral Department of Sociology/Anthropology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal. nabinrawal@gmail.com.
Allyson M PollockCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK. a.pollock@qmul.ac.uk.
Queen Mary University of London · GBNortheastern University · USPatan Academy of Health Sciences · NPTribhuvan University · NPUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocal pharmaceutical production has been endorsed by the WHO as a means of addressing health priorities of developing countries. However, local producers of essential medicines must comply with international pharmaceutical standards in order to be eligible to compete in donor tenders. These standards determine production rights for on-patent and off-patent medicines, and guide international procurement of medicines. We reviewed the literature on the impact of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) on local production; a gap analysis from the literature review indicated a need for further research. Over sixty interviews were conducted with people involved in the Nepali pharmaceutical production and distribution chain from 2006 to 2009 on the GMP areas of relevance: regulatory capacity, staffing, funding and training, resourcing of GMP, inspectors' interpretation of the rules and compliance.

resultsAlthough Nepal producers have increased their overall share of the domestic market, only the public manufacturer, Royal Drugs, focuses on medicines for public health programmes; private producers engage mainly in brand competition for private markets, not essential medicines. Nepali regulators and producers state that implementation of GMP standards is hindered by low regulatory capacity, insufficient training of staff in the industry, financial constraints and lack of investment for upgrading capital. The transition period to mandatory compliance with WHO GMP rules is lengthy. Less than half of private producers had WHO GMP in 2013. Producers are not directly affected by international harmonisation of standards as they do not export medicines and the Nepali regulator does not enforce the WHO standards strictly. Without an international GMP certificate they cannot tender for donor dependent health programmes.

conclusionsIn Nepal, local private manufacturers focus mainly on brand competition for private consumption not essential medicines, the government preferentially procures essential medicines from the only public producer while donor funded programmes rely on international manufacturers compliant with international GMP standards. We also found evidence of private hospitals bypassing national medicines approvals process. Policies in support of local pharmaceutical production in developing countries as a source of essential medicines need to examine carefully how GMP regulations impact on regulators, local industry and production of essential medicines in practice.

Indexed as

CommerceDrug IndustryHumansInterviews as TopicNepalOrganizational Case StudiesPrescription DrugsQualitative ResearchPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID26072308
PMCPMC4470019
OpenAlexW1554102606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.