ArticleRheumatology international2016
CCR5Δ32 (rs333) polymorphism is associated with the susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus in female Brazilian patients.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of MECP2 and CCR5 Polymorphisms on the Development and Course of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Biomolecules · 2020Trial
- Variability of the rs333 in Polish patients with lupus erythematosus.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2021Article
- CCR5Δ32 in Brazil: Impacts of a European Genetic Variant on a Highly Admixed Population.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Metabolomics as an Approach to Characterise the Contrasting Roles of CCR5 in the Presence and Absence of Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Comparison of the editing patterns and editing efficiencies of TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 when targeting the human CCR5 gene.Genetics and molecular biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of CCR5Δ32 (rs333) polymorphism in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been evaluated worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine the association between CCR5Δ32 polymorphism with the susceptibility to SLE and the activity of disease in female Southern Brazilian patients. The study enrolled 169 female SLE patients and 132 unrelated female healthy individuals. Baseline clinical, laboratorial characteristics, and the SLE activity (determined using the SLEDAI) were evaluated according to the CCR5Δ32 genotypes. The CCR5Δ32 polymorphism was determined from genomic DNA using a polymerase chain reaction. The frequencies of the genotypes CCR5/CCR5, CCR5/CCR5Δ32, and CCR5Δ32/CCR5Δ32 were 87.6, 11.8, and 0.6 %, respectively, among the patients and 96.2, 3.8, and 0.0 %, respectively, among the controls [CCR5/CCR5 vs. CCR5/CCR5Δ32 + CCR5Δ32/CCR5Δ32: p = 0.0081, odds ratio 3.604 (95 % confidence interval 1.321-9.4836)]. The frequencies of the CCR5 and the CCR5Δ32 alleles were 93.2 and 6.8 % among the patients, and 98.1 and 1.9 % among the controls, respectively (p = 0.0047, OR 3.758, 95 % CI 1.409-10.80). Patients carrying the genotypes with the CCR5Δ32 allele presented earlier age of onset of disease (p = 0.0293) and higher levels of anti-dsDNA (p = 0.0255) than those carrying the wild-type genotype. When the analysis was adjusted for ethnicity, only the age at onset of disease remained significant (p > 0.05). The results suggest that the CCR5Δ32 polymorphism might be associated with SLE genetic predisposition among female Brazilian patients and the age at onset of the disease; however, this genetic variant was not associated with the activity of SLE in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.