Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26071239›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2016

Management Algorithm for Leaks Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

A Nimeri, M Ibrahim, A Maasher, M Al Hadad

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04834323 (Short Term Outcome Of Distal Mesogastric Fixation After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy; A Randomized Control Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04834323 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Short Term Outcome Of Distal Mesogastric Fixation After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy; A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZagazig UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled84ConditionsBariatric Surgery CandidateArmsdistal mesogastric fixation after sleeve gastrectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Nonoperative Management of Leaks After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With Endoscopic Stents in a Tertiary Referral Center.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Trends in Utilization and Relative Complication Rates of Bariatric Procedures.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A NimeriBariatric and Metabolic Institute (BMI), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. nimeri@gmail.com.
M IbrahimBariatric and Metabolic Institute (BMI), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
A MaasherBariatric and Metabolic Institute (BMI), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
M Al HadadBariatric and Metabolic Institute (BMI), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Shaikh Khalifa Medical City · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a serious complication. No clear algorithm has been described for management.

methodsWe reviewed our prospective database for all leaks after LSG treated at the Bariatric and Metabolic Institute (BMI) Abu Dhabi from 2010 to 2014. Our management algorithm is based on the timing of the LSG leak, nutritional status of the patient, and the presence of stenosis or peritonitis. Acute leaks with or without peritonitis are treated by operatively or utilizing endoscopic stenting, respectively. LSG leaks with stenosis not amenable to endoscopic stenting are treated with laparoscopic Roux en Y esophagojejunostomy (LRYEJ).

resultsWe performed 236 LSG without a leak, and 14 LSG leaks were referred to our unit. Mean age was 35.6 years, and 50 % of patients were males. Mean BMI was 37 kg/m(2). The patients presented on average 13.9 weeks after LSG. Enteral feeding was used as the primary nutrition route in 85.5 % of patients. Our management strategy was operative in 78.4 % of patients (jejunostomy feeding in 57 % and LRYEJ in 21.4 % of patients) and conservative with or without stents in 21.6 % of patients. Mean in hospital length of stay (LOS) was 5.6 weeks. Our reoperation rate was 7 %. There were no mortalities and one patient 7 % developed pulmonary embolism. None of the patients treated returned with a leak or collection after a mean follow up of 23.6 months.

conclusionTreating leaks following LSG based on the timing of presentation, presence of stricture, and malnutrition is safe and effective.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsAnastomosis, Roux-en-YAnastomotic LeakBariatric SurgeryConstriction, PathologicDisease ManagementEnteral NutritionFemaleGastrectomyHumansJejunostomyLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedAlgorithm for managementLeaksSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID26071239
OpenAlexW2121834684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.