Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26070718›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.)2015

Advances in Mass Spectrometric Tools for Probing Neuropeptides.

Amanda Buchberger, Qing Yu, Lingjun Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Mass Spectrometric Profiling of Neuropeptides inACS chemical neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amanda BuchbergerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1322; email: abuchberger@wisc.edu.
Qing Yu
Lingjun Li

Funding

Mass Spectrometric Studies of Neuropeptides in FeedingR01DK071801 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LINGJUN LI · 2006 to 2026
$6.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS 1R01DK071801NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK071801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropeptides are important mediators in the functionality of the brain and other neurological organs. Because neuropeptides exist in a wide range of concentrations, appropriate characterization methods are needed to provide dynamic, chemical, and spatial information. Mass spectrometry and compatible tools have been a popular choice in analyzing neuropeptides. There have been several advances and challenges, both of which are the focus of this review. Discussions range from sample collection to bioinformatic tools, although avenues such as quantitation and imaging are included. Further development of the presented methods for neuropeptidomic mass spectrometric analysis is inevitable, which will lead to a further understanding of the complex interplay of neuropeptides and other signaling molecules in the nervous system.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansMass SpectrometryNeuropeptidesNeuropeptidesmass spectrometric imagingmass spectrometrymicrodialysisneuropeptidomicsquantitationsample preparation

Identifiers

PMID26070718
PMCPMC6314846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.