Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26070672›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

Beyond Agar: Gel Substrates with Improved Optical Clarity and Drug Efficiency and Reduced Autofluorescence for Microbial Growth Experiments.

Philipp A Jaeger, Cameron McElfresh, Lily R Wong, Trey Ideker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advances and Challenges in FluorescenceFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philipp A JaegerDepartments of Bioengineering and Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3624-0802
Cameron McElfreshNanoengineering Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Lily R WongBioengineering Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Trey IdekerDepartments of Bioengineering and Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA tideker@ucsd.edu.
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

A Systems Approach to Mapping the DNA Damage ResponseR01ES014811 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2005 to 2021
$8.6M
Comparative Analysis of Genetic Interaction NetworksR01GM084279 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY, KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2008 to 2017
$3.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES014811NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES014811NIGMS NIH HHS GM084279NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agar, a seaweed extract, has been the standard support matrix for microbial experiments for over a century. Recent developments in high-throughput genetic screens have created a need to reevaluate the suitability of agar for use as colony support, as modern robotic printing systems now routinely spot thousands of colonies within the area of a single microtiter plate. Identifying optimal biophysical, biochemical, and biological properties of the gel support matrix in these extreme experimental conditions is instrumental to achieving the best possible reproducibility and sensitivity. Here we systematically evaluate a range of gelling agents by using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model microbe. We find that carrageenan and Phytagel have superior optical clarity and reduced autofluorescence, crucial for high-resolution imaging and fluorescent reporter screens. Nutrient choice and use of refined Noble agar or pure agarose reduce the effective dose of numerous selective drugs by >50%, potentially enabling large cost savings in genetic screens. Using thousands of mutant yeast strains to compare colony growth between substrates, we found no evidence of significant growth or nutrient biases between gel substrates, indicating that researchers could freely pick and choose the optimal gel for their respective application and experimental condition.

Indexed as

AgarGelsChemical PhenomenaCulture MediaHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMicrobiological TechniquesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAgarCulture MediaGels

Identifiers

PMID26070672
PMCPMC4510171
OpenAlexW1912755047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.