Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26070671›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2015

World Health Organization International Standard To Harmonize Assays for Detection of Mycoplasma DNA.

C Micha Nübling, Sally A Baylis, Kay-Martin Hanschmann, Thomas Montag-Lessing, Michael Chudy, Julia Kreß, Ursula Ulrych, Stefan Czurda, Renate Rosengarten, Mycoplasma Collaborative Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Clinical implications of the genus Mycoplasma].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

C Micha NüblingPaul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany Micha.Nuebling@pei.de.
Sally A BaylisPaul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
Kay-Martin HanschmannPaul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
Thomas Montag-LessingPaul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
Michael ChudyPaul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
Julia KreßPaul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
Ursula UlrychMycosafe Diagnostics GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan CzurdaMycosafe Diagnostics GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Renate RosengartenMycosafe Diagnostics GmbH, Vienna, Austria Institute of Bacteriology, Mycology and Hygiene, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Mycoplasma Collaborative Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleic acid amplification technique (NAT)-based assays (referred to here as NAT assays) are increasingly used as an alternative to culture-based approaches for the detection of mycoplasma contamination of cell cultures. Assay features, like the limit of detection or quantification, vary widely between different mycoplasma NAT assays. Biological reference materials may be useful for harmonization of mycoplasma NAT assays. An international feasibility study included lyophilized preparations of four distantly related mycoplasma species (Acholeplasma laidlawii, Mycoplasma fermentans, M. orale, M. pneumoniae) at different concentrations which were analyzed by 21 laboratories using 26 NAT assays with a qualitative, semiquantitative, or quantitative design. An M. fermentans preparation was shown to decrease the interassay variation when used as a common reference material. The preparation was remanufactured and characterized in a comparability study, and its potency (in NAT-detectable units) across different NATs was determined. The World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) established this preparation to be the "1st World Health Organization international standard for mycoplasma DNA for nucleic acid amplification technique-based assays designed for generic mycoplasma detection" (WHO Tech Rep Ser 987:42, 2014) with a potency of 200,000 IU/ml. This WHO international standard is now available as a reference preparation for characterization of NAT assays, e.g., for determination of analytic sensitivity, for calibration of quantitative assays in a common unitage, and for defining regulatory requirements in the field of mycoplasma testing.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialLaboratoriesMycoplasmaNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesWorld Health OrganizationDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID26070671
PMCPMC4551258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.