ArticleJournal of translational medicine2015
Unravelling personalized dysfunctional gene network of complex diseases based on differential network model.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms underlying the protective effects of San-Bai decoction against UV radiation on the skin.International journal of cosmetic science · 2026Article
- Review
- Bayesian inference of sample-specific coexpression networks.Genome research · 2024Article
- Scanning sample-specific miRNA regulation from bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing data.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Inference of differential gene regulatory networks using boosted differential trees.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Bayesian Optimized sample-specific Networks Obtained By Omics data (BONOBO).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Landscape dynamic network biomarker analysis reveals the tipping point of transcriptome reprogramming to prevent skin photodamage.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2022Article
- Network Control Models With Personalized Genomics Data for Understanding Tumor Heterogeneity in Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Novel cancer subtyping method based on patient-specific gene regulatory network.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Performance assessment of sample-specific network control methods for bulk and single-cell biological data analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Network controllability-based algorithm to target personalized driver genes for discovering combinatorial drugs of individual patients.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Interpreting Functional Impact of Genetic Variations by Network QTL for Genotype-Phenotype Association Study.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Identification of Key Genes With Differential Correlations in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Identification of Key Genes for the Ultrahigh Yield of Rice Using Dynamic Cross-tissue Network Analysis.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2020Article
- System-Based Differential Gene Network Analysis for Characterizing a Sample-Specific Subnetwork.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- Rewiring of Microbiota Networks in Erosive Inflammation of the Stomach and Small Bowel.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Roles of transforming growth factor-β and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase isoforms in integrin β1-mediated bio-behaviors of mouse lung telocytes.Journal of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Dynamically characterizing individual clinical change by the steady state of disease-associated pathway.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Characterizing the Personalized Microbiota Dynamics for Disease Classification by Individual-Specific Edge-Network Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Understanding diseases as increased heterogeneity: a complex network computational framework.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the conventional analysis of complex diseases, the control and case samples are assumed to be of great purity. However, due to the heterogeneity of disease samples, many disease genes are even not always consistently up-/down-regulated, leading to be under-estimated. This problem will seriously influence effective personalized diagnosis or treatment. The expression variance and expression covariance can address such a problem in a network manner. But, these analyses always require multiple samples rather than one sample, which is generally not available in clinical practice for each individual. To extract the common and specific network characteristics for individual patients in this paper, a novel differential network model, e.g. personalized dysfunctional gene network, is proposed to integrate those genes with different features, such as genes with the differential gene expression (DEG), genes with the differential expression variance (DEVG) and gene-pairs with the differential expression covariance (DECG) simultaneously, to construct personalized dysfunctional networks. This model uses a new statistic-like measurement on differential information, i.e., a differential score (DEVC), to reconstruct the differential expression network between groups of normal and diseased samples; and further quantitatively evaluate different feature genes in the patient-specific network for each individual. This DEVC-based differential expression network (DEVC-net) has been applied to the study of complex diseases for prostate cancer and diabetes. (1) Characterizing the global expression change between normal and diseased samples, the differential gene networks of those diseases were found to have a new bi-coloured topological structure, where their non hub-centred sub-networks are mainly composed of genes/proteins controlling various biological processes. (2) The differential expression variance/covariance rather than differential expression is new informative sources, and can be used to identify genes or gene-pairs with discriminative power, which are ignored by traditional methods. (3) More importantly, DEVC-net is effective to measure the expression state or activity of different feature genes and their network or modules in one sample for an individual. All of these results support that DEVC-net indeed has a clear advantage to effectively extract discriminatively interpretable features of gene/protein network of one sample (i.e. personalized dysfunctional network) even when disease samples are heterogeneous, and thus can provide new features like gene-pairs, in addition to the conventional individual genes, to the analysis of the personalized diagnosis and prognosis, and a better understanding on the underlying biological mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.