Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26070466›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2015

Quantitative high resolution melting: two methods to determine SNP allele frequencies from pooled samples.

Roxana L Capper, Young K Jin, Petra B Lundgren, Lesa M Peplow, Mikhail V Matz, Madeleine J H van Oppen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roxana L CapperDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. roxana.capper@gmail.com.
Young K JinSchool of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld, 4811, Australia. youngkoo.jin@my.jcu.edu.au.
Petra B LundgrenDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia. petra.b.lundgren@gmail.com.
Lesa M PeplowAustralian Institute of Marine Science, PMB3, Townsville MC, Qld, 4810, Australia. l.peplow@aims.gov.au.
Mikhail V MatzDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. matz@utexas.edu.
Madeleine J H van OppenAustralian Institute of Marine Science, PMB3, Townsville MC, Qld, 4810, Australia. m.vanoppen@aims.gov.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe advent of next-generation sequencing has brought about an explosion of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data in non-model organisms; however, profiling these SNPs across multiple natural populations still requires substantial time and resources.

resultsHere, we introduce two cost-efficient quantitative High Resolution Melting (qHRM) methods for measuring allele frequencies at known SNP loci in pooled DNA samples: the "peaks" method, which can be applied to large numbers of SNPs, and the "curves" method, which is more labor intensive but also slightly more accurate. Using the reef-building coral Acropora millepora, we show that both qHRM methods can recover the allele proportions from mixtures prepared using two or more individuals of known genotype. We further demonstrate advantages of each method over previously published methods; specifically, the "peaks" method can be rapidly scaled to screen several hundred SNPs at once, whereas the "curves" method is better suited for smaller numbers of SNPs.

conclusionsCompared to genotyping individual samples, these methods can save considerable effort and genotyping costs when relatively few candidate SNPs must be profiled across a large number of populations. One of the main applications of this method could be validation of SNPs of interest identified in population genomic studies.

Indexed as

AllelesGene FrequencyNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsAnthozoaReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID26070466
PMCPMC4465018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.