Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26070362›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2015

Data quality in drug discovery: the role of analytical performance in ligand binding assays.

Hermann Wätzig, Imke Oltmann-Norden, Franziska Steinicke, Hassan A Alhazmi, Markus Nachbar, Deia Abd El-Hady, Hassan M Albishri, Knut Baumann, Thomas Exner, Frank M Böckler and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hermann WätzigInstitute of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, TU Braunschweig, Beethovenstr. 55, 38106, Brunswick, Germany. h.waetzig@tu-bs.de.
Imke Oltmann-NordenInstitute of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, TU Braunschweig, Beethovenstr. 55, 38106, Brunswick, Germany.
Franziska SteinickeInstitute of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, TU Braunschweig, Beethovenstr. 55, 38106, Brunswick, Germany.
Hassan A AlhazmiInstitute of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, TU Braunschweig, Beethovenstr. 55, 38106, Brunswick, Germany.
Markus NachbarInstitute of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, TU Braunschweig, Beethovenstr. 55, 38106, Brunswick, Germany.
Deia Abd El-HadyChemistry Department, Faculty of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Hassan M AlbishriChemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 80203, Saudi Arabia.
Knut BaumannInstitute of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, TU Braunschweig, Beethovenstr. 55, 38106, Brunswick, Germany.
Thomas ExnerPharmaceutical Institute, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 8, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Frank M BöcklerPharmaceutical Institute, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 8, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Sami El DeebInstitute of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, TU Braunschweig, Beethovenstr. 55, 38106, Brunswick, Germany.
Technische Universität Braunschweig · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DEAssiut University · EGKing Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite its importance and all the considerable efforts made, the progress in drug discovery is limited. One main reason for this is the partly questionable data quality. Models relating biological activity and structures and in silico predictions rely on precisely and accurately measured binding data. However, these data vary so strongly, such that only variations by orders of magnitude are considered as unreliable. This can certainly be improved considering the high analytical performance in pharmaceutical quality control. Thus the principles, properties and performances of biochemical and cell-based assays are revisited and evaluated. In the part of biochemical assays immunoassays, fluorescence assays, surface plasmon resonance, isothermal calorimetry, nuclear magnetic resonance and affinity capillary electrophoresis are discussed in details, in addition radiation-based ligand binding assays, mass spectrometry, atomic force microscopy and microscale thermophoresis are briefly evaluated. In addition, general sources of error, such as solvent, dilution, sample pretreatment and the quality of reagents and reference materials are discussed. Biochemical assays can be optimized to provide good accuracy and precision (e.g. percental relative standard deviation <10 %). Cell-based assays are often considered superior related to the biological significance, however, typically they cannot still be considered as really quantitative, in particular when results are compared over longer periods of time or between laboratories. A very careful choice of assays is therefore recommended. Strategies to further optimize assays are outlined, considering the evaluation and the decrease of the relevant error sources. Analytical performance and data quality are still advancing and will further advance the progress in drug development.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyDrug DiscoveryBiological AssayCalorimetryDatabases, FactualElectrophoresis, CapillaryFluorescenceImmunoassayLigandsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPharmaceutical PreparationsSensitivity and SpecificitySurface Plasmon ResonanceLigandsPharmaceutical PreparationsBiochemical assaysCell-based assaysDatabasesDrug discoveryLigand binding assayPrecision

Identifiers

PMID26070362
OpenAlexW636297489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.