Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26070220›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of occupational and environmental health2015

More evidence of unpublished industry studies of lead smelter/refinery workers.

Marianne Sullivan

Open access · greenAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of occupational and environmental health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marianne SullivanDepartment of Public Health, William Paterson University of New Jersey, 300 Pompton Road , Wayne, NJ, USA.
William Paterson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLead smelter/refinery workers in the US have had significant exposure to lead and are an important occupational group to study to understand the health effects of chronic lead exposure in adults. Recent research found evidence that studies of lead smelter/refinery workers have been conducted but not published. This paper presents further evidence for this contention.

objectivesTo present further evidence of industry conducted, unpublished epidemiologic studies of lead smelter/refinery workers and health outcomes.

methodsHistorical research relying on primary sources such as internal industry documents and published studies.

resultsASARCO smelter/refinery workers were studied in the early 1980s and found to have increased risk of lung cancer and stroke in one study, but not in another.

conclusionsBecause occupational lead exposure is an on-going concern for US and overseas workers, all epidemiologic studies should be made available to evaluate and update occupational health and safety standards.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAir Pollutants, OccupationalChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInfantLead PoisoningLung NeoplasmsMaleAir Pollutants, OccupationalCerebrovascular diseaseLead exposureLead refineryLead smelterLung cancerOccupational healthSmelter workers

Identifiers

PMID26070220
PMCPMC4727590
OpenAlexW2254575903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.