ArticleCartilage2012
Supporting Biomaterials for Articular Cartilage Repair.
Article in Cartilage, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in extracellular vesicle-based nanomedicine for regenerative orthopaedics.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Agarose Hydrogels for Bone Tissue Engineering, from Injectables to Bioprinting.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Evolving functional hydrogel strategies for cartilage engineering: from fundamentals to functional regeneration.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
- Engineering with Biomedical Sciences Changing the Horizon of Healthcare-A Review.Bioengineered · 2024Review
- Injectable Janus Base Nanomatrix (JBNm) in Maintaining Long-Term Homeostasis of Regenerated Cartilage for Tissue Chip Applications.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Tissue engineering strategies hold promise for the repair of articular cartilage injury.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Review
- A review of advanced hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Engineered biochemical cues of regenerative biomaterials to enhance endogenous stem/progenitor cells (ESPCs)-mediated articular cartilage repair.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- Finite Element Analysis of Different Osseocartilaginous Reconstruction Techniques in Animal Model Knees.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Biological Scaffolds Assembled with Magnetic Nanoparticles for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Combinatorial Effect of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Extracellular Vesicles in a Hydrogel on Cartilage Regeneration.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023Article
- Microcarriers in application for cartilage tissue engineering: Recent progress and challenges.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
- Synthesis and Characterization of a Novel Composite Scaffold Based on Hyaluronic Acid and Equine Type I Collagen.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Biomimetic approach to articular cartilage tissue engineering using carbon nanotube-coated and textured polydimethylsiloxane scaffolds.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2022Article
- Methods of Modification of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Conditions of Their Culturing for Hyaline Cartilage Tissue Engineering.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Silk Fiber-Reinforced Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel for Cartilage Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Advanced Multi-Dimensional Cellular Models as Emerging Reality to ReproduceInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Cartilage tissue engineering for obesity-induced osteoarthritis: Physiology, challenges, and future prospects.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2021Review
- A Comprehensive Analysis of SE-lncRNA/mRNA Differential Expression Profiles During Chondrogenic Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Extraction and Characterization of Collagen from Elasmobranch Byproducts for Potential Biomaterial Use.Marine drugs · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthopedic surgeons and researchers worldwide are continuously faced with the challenge of regenerating articular cartilage defects. However, until now, it has not been possible to completely mimic the biological and biochemical properties of articular cartilage using current research and development approaches. In this review, biomaterials previously used for articular cartilage repair research are addressed. Furthermore, a brief discussion of the state of the art of current cell printing procedures mimicking native cartilage is offered in light of their use as future alternatives for cartilage tissue engineering. Inkjet cell printing, controlled deposition cell printing tools, and laser cell printing are cutting-edge techniques in this context. The development of mimetic hydrogels with specific biological properties relevant to articular cartilage native tissue will support the development of improved, functional, and novel engineered tissue for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.