ArticleCurrent genomics2015
Detecting the Genomic Signature of Divergent Selection in Presence of Gene Flow.
Article in Current genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of local adaptation is a main focus of evolutionary biology since it may contribute to explain the current species diversity. The genomic scan procedures permit for the first time to study the connection between specific DNA patterns and processes as natural selection, genetic drift, recombination, mutation and gene flow. Accordingly, the information on genomes from non-model organisms increases and the interest on detecting the signal of natural selection in the DNA sequences of different populations also raises. The main goal of the present work is to explore a sequence-based method for detecting natural selection in divergent populations connected by migration. In doing so, we rely on a recently published statistic based upon th e definition of haplotype allelic classes (HAC). The original measure was modified to be more sensitive to intermediate frequencies in non-model species. A linkage-disequilibrium-based method was also assayed and individual-based simulations were performed to test the methods. The results suggest that the HAC-based methods and, specifically, the new proposed method are quite powerful for detecting the footprint of moderate divergent selection. They are also robust to reasonable model misspecification. One obvious advantage of the new algorithm is that it does not require knowledge of the allelic state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.