Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26069363›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pharmacology

A retrospective study of use of polyvalent anti-snake venom and risk factors for mortality from snake bite in a tertiary care setting.

Shraddha M Pore, Sunita J Ramanand, Praveenkumar T Patil, Alka D Gore, Mayur P Pawar, Smita L Gaidhankar, Ravi R Ghanghas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Serious Adverse Reactions to Anti-snake Venom in Children with Snake Envenomation: An Underappreciated Contributor to Snakebite Mortality?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The North-South divide in snake bite envenomation in India.Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shraddha M PoreDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Miraj, Maharashtra, India.
Sunita J RamanandDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Miraj, Maharashtra, India.
Praveenkumar T PatilDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Miraj, Maharashtra, India.
Alka D GoreDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, BVDU Medical College, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.
Mayur P PawarDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Miraj, Maharashtra, India.
Smita L GaidhankarDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Miraj, Maharashtra, India.
Ravi R GhanghasDepartment of Pharmacology, Government Medical College, Miraj, Maharashtra, India.
Government Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsEnvenomation with poisonous snakes is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The present study was undertaken with the objectives of assessing anti-snake venom (ASV) use, early adverse reactions to ASV, premedication and clinical outcomes in snake bite patients. Association of various risk factors (age, gender, dose of ASV, time gap between snake bite and ASV administration, use of mechanical ventilation and type of snake bite) with mortality was also assessed. SETTINGS AND

designThis retrospective study was conducted at two Tertiary Care Teaching Hospitals. SUBJECTS AND

methodsThe medical records of 176 patients of snake bite with documented use of ASV were retrospectively analyzed to retrieve relevant data. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics was used to express results about ASV use, early adverse reactions to ASV, premedication and clinical outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to find out significant risk factors associated with mortality.

resultsThe main indication for ASV was vasculotoxic snake bite (75%) followed by neurotoxic snake bite (16%). Mean dose of ASV was 18.63 ± 14.52 vials. Prophylactic premedication with corticosteroids alone or in combination with antihistaminic was used in more than 70% patients. Early adverse reactions to ASV were seen in 4% patients. Neurotoxic snake bite was a significant risk factor associated with mortality in multivariate analysis.

conclusionsNeurotoxic snake bite is an independent predictor of mortality in snake bite patients. Currently used polyvalent ASV may be less effective in treating neurotoxic snake bite.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAntiveninsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedNeurotoxicity SyndromesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAntiveninsAntivenomsmortalitypremedicationsnake bite

Identifiers

PMID26069363
PMCPMC4450551
OpenAlexW1566932432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.