Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26069305›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2015

¹⁸F-DCFBC PET/CT for PSMA-Based Detection and Characterization of Primary Prostate Cancer.

Steven P Rowe, Kenneth L Gage, Sheila F Faraj, Katarzyna J Macura, Toby C Cornish, Nilda Gonzalez-Roibon, Gunes Guner, Enrico Munari, Alan W Partin, Christian P Pavlovich and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
27.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Detection of prostate cancer withWorld journal of urology · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Comparative Analysis ofAdvances in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. A comparative study ofBMC medical imaging · 2024
    Article
  13. SyntheticRSC medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Improved [Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Gross tumor volume delineation in primary prostate cancer onCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven P Rowe *The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kenneth L Gage *The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sheila F FarajDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Katarzyna J MacuraThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Toby C CornishDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Nilda Gonzalez-RoibonDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Gunes GunerDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Enrico MunariDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Alan W PartinThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Christian P PavlovichThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Misop HanThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
H Ballentine CarterThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Trinity J BivalacquaThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Amanda BlackfordThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Daniel HoltThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Robert F DannalsThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
George J NettoDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Martin A LodgeThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ronnie C MeaseThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Martin G PomperThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Steve Y ChoThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
PSMA-based Cancer Imaging AgentsR01CA134675 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI POMPER, MARTIN G · 2009 to 2025
$6.2M
Training for Clinician Scientists in Imaging ResearchT32EB006351 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI POMPER, MARTIN G · 2006 to 2022
$4.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA134675NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134675NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB006351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWe previously demonstrated the ability to detect metastatic prostate cancer using N-[N-[(S)-1,3-dicarboxypropyl]carbamoyl]-4-(18)F-fluorobenzyl-L-cysteine ((18)F-DCFBC), a low-molecular-weight radiotracer that targets the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). PSMA has been shown to be associated with higher Gleason grade and more aggressive disease. An imaging biomarker able to detect clinically significant high-grade primary prostate cancer reliably would address an unmet clinical need by allowing for risk-adapted patient management.

methodsWe enrolled 13 patients with primary prostate cancer who were imaged with (18)F-DCFBC PET before scheduled prostatectomy, with 12 of these patients also undergoing pelvic prostate MR imaging. Prostate (18)F-DCFBC PET was correlated with MR imaging and histologic and immunohistochemical analysis on a prostate-segment (12 regions) and dominant-lesion basis. There were no incidental extraprostatic findings on PET suggestive of metastatic disease.

resultsMR imaging was more sensitive than (18)F-DCFBC PET for detection of primary prostate cancer on a per-segment (sensitivities of up to 0.17 and 0.39 for PET and MR imaging, respectively) and per-dominant-lesion analysis (sensitivities of 0.46 and 0.92 for PET and MR imaging, respectively). However, (18)F-DCFBC PET was more specific than MR imaging by per-segment analysis (specificities of 0.96 and 0.89 for PET and MR imaging for corresponding sensitivity, respectively) and specific for detection of high-grade lesions (Gleason 8 and 9) greater than 1.0 mL in size (4/4 of these patients positive by PET). (18)F-DCFBC uptake in tumors was positively correlated with Gleason score (ρ = 0.64; PSMA expression, ρ = 0.47; and prostate-specific antigen, ρ = 0.52). There was significantly lower (18)F-DCFBC uptake in benign prostatic hypertrophy than primary tumors (median maximum standardized uptake value, 2.2 vs. 3.5; P = 0.004).

conclusionAlthough the sensitivity of (18)F-DCFBC for primary prostate cancer was less than MR imaging, (18)F-DCFBC PET was able to detect the more clinically significant high-grade and larger-volume tumors (Gleason score 8 and 9) with higher specificity than MR imaging. In particular, there was relatively low (18)F-DCFBC PET uptake in benign prostatic hypertrophy lesions, compared with cancer in the prostate, which may allow for more specific detection of primary prostate cancer by (18)F-DCFBC PET. This study demonstrates the utility of PSMA-based PET, which may be used in conjunction with MR imaging to identify clinically significant prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAntigens, SurfaceBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCysteineGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansHypertrophyImmunohistochemistryMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisAntigens, SurfaceBiomarkers, TumorCysteineFluorodeoxyglucose F18FOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIN-(N-((S)-1,3-Dicarboxypropyl)carbamoyl)-4-(18F)fluorobenzyl-L-cysteineMRIPET/CTprimary prostate cancerprostatectomyprostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)

Identifiers

PMID26069305
PMCPMC4659400
OpenAlexW1919117211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.