Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26069298›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2016

Old benefit as much as young patients with stroke from high-intensity neurorehabilitation: cohort analysis.

Stefan Knecht, Jens Roßmüller, Michael Unrath, Klaus-Martin Stephan, Klaus Berger, Bettina Studer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03641651 (Feasibility and Cost Description of Intensive Rehabilitation Involving New Technologies in Patients With Sub-acute Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03641651 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Cost Description of Intensive Rehabilitation Involving New Technologies in Patients With Sub-acute Stroke:A Multicenter Single Arm Trial of the Swiss RehabTech Initiative

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarkus WirzRan2018 to 2020Enrolled15ConditionsStroke, HemiplegiaArmsRehabilitation technology
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Conquering the inner couch potato: precommitment is an effective strategy to enhance motivation for effortful actions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  15. Research in the Acute Rehabilitation Setting: a Bridge Too Far?Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  16. Rehabilitation and the Neural Network After Stroke.Translational stroke research · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Brain regions important for recovery after severe post-stroke upper limb paresis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2017
    Article
  19. The contribution of lesion location to upper limb deficit after stroke.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefan KnechtDepartment of Neurology, Mauritius Hospital, Meerbusch, Germany Medical Faculty, Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jens RoßmüllerDepartment of Neurology, Mauritius Hospital, Meerbusch, Germany.
Michael UnrathInstitute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Klaus-Martin StephanDepartment of Neurology, Mauritius Hospital, Meerbusch, Germany.
Klaus BergerInstitute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Bettina StuderDepartment of Neurology, Mauritius Hospital, Meerbusch, Germany Medical Faculty, Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9483-385X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIn current clinical practice, old patients with stroke are less frequently admitted to neurorehabilitation units following acute care than younger patients based on an assumption that old age negatively impacts the benefit obtained from high-intensity neurorehabilitation. Our objective was to test this assumption empirically in a large sample of patients with stroke.

methodsFunctional recovery during 4 weeks of inpatient neurorehabilitation was assessed with the Barthel Index (BI) in 422 middle-aged (<65 years), 1399 old (65-80 years) and 473 very old (>80 years) patients with stroke. Overall functional recovery, recovery patterns and the relationship between therapy intensity and recovery were statistically compared between the three age groups.

resultsOverall functional recovery was statistically equivalent in middle-aged, old and very old patients (average improvement in BI total score: middle-aged: 15 points; old: 15 points; very old: 14 points). A novel item-wise logistic regression analysis (see Pedersen, Severinsen & Nielsen, 2014, Neurorehabil Neural Repair) revealed that this was true for 9 of the 10 everyday functions assessed by the BI. Furthermore, functional recovery was predicted by the amount of therapy (R=0.14; p=0.0001), and age did not moderate this relationship between therapy intensity and recovery (p=0.70).

conclusionsOld and even very old patients with stroke benefit from specialised inpatient neurorehabilitation and high amounts of therapy in the same degree as younger patients. Contrary to current clinical practice, old age should not be a criterion against admission to a neurorehabilitation unit following acute stroke treatment.

Indexed as

Neurological RehabilitationRecovery of FunctionStroke RehabilitationAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexCLINICAL NEUROLOGYEVIDENCE-BASED NEUROLOGYREHABILITATIONSTROKE

Identifiers

PMID26069298
PMCPMC4853552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.